In 500 words or more, describe in your own words, Risk Mitigation Techniques for the OWASP Top Ten Vulnerabilities. Make sure to cover the following for each vulnerability:
· Vulnerability Name
· Prevention Technique
· Prevention Tool(s)
Please Provide Turnitin report
In 500 words or more, describe in your own words, Risk Mitigation Techniques for the OWASP Top Ten Vulnerabilities. Make sure to cover the following for each vulnerability:
· Vulnerability Name
· Prevention Technique
· Prevention Tool(s)
Please Provide Turnitin report
In 250-300 words
You are the web master of a college website. You share a server with other school departments such as accounting and HR. create at least five security-related rules for staff members who are adding web pages being added to your site. Include a justification and explanation for each rule. Rules should relate to college, staff and student, and system information security.
Databases and Security
You have been asked to design a security policy for a database that contains very sensitive information. Discuss five important issues that should be addressed.
500 Words minimum. 2 sources minimummum (accessible website source preferred)
Please answer the below in 2-3 lines:
1. With all the stories about millions and millions of bytes of personal data having been exposed, why is their still any faith at all in the Internet?
2. How has the term hacking changed meaning over the years?
3. What is the most dangerous hacker tool?
4. From the news: How were NSA’s hacker tools compromised?
5. What was the vulnerability in the Target Breach?
6. What do you think of hactivism?
7. How did Stuxnet work?
8. What was the Arpanet?
9. Deep brain stimulation is a treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Medical devices such as these are now becoming accessible through the web. Consider the dangers (threat surface)?
10. What is the Red Team?
Researchers consider validity and reliability with each new study they design. This is because validity and reliability are not fixed but rather reflect a particular study’s unique variables, research design, instruments, and participants.
In the context of research design, two types of validity, which speak to the quality of different features of the research process, are considered: internal validity and external validity. Assuming that the findings of a research study are internally valid—i.e., the researcher has used controls to determine that the outcome is indeed due to manipulation of the independent variable or the treatment—external validity refers to the extent to which the findings can be generalized from the sample to the population or to other settings and groups. Reliability refers to the replicability of the findings.
For this Discussion, you will consider threats to internal and external validity in quantitative research and the strategies used to mitigate these threats. You will also consider the ethical implications of designing quantitative research.
Post an explanation of a threat to internal validity and a threat to external validity in quantitative research. Next, explain a strategy to mitigate each of these threats. Then, identify a potential ethical issue in quantitative research and explain how it might influence design decisions. Finally, explain what it means for a research topic to be amenable to scientific study using a quantitative approach.
Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.
Babbie, E. (2017) Basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Burkholder, G. J., Cox, K. A., Crawford, L. M., & Hitchcock, J. H. (Eds.). (2020). Research designs and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Discussion 1: Define the terms culture, ethnocentrism, and prejudice, and describe their relationship to one another. Then, select one case study from Chapter 16 in Leadership: Theory and Practice, based on its relevance to your professional or personal interests, and briefly discuss how you see these concepts in action in the case. How would you coach leadership of the organization in the case to be more effective and supportive of diverse people?
Discussion 2: Define and describe the principles of ethical leadership. Which two of the five principles covered in Chapter 16 do you think are the most important, and why? Discuss this in the context of a specific example, either from your own professional experience, or from one of the case studies in Chapter 13 of the course textbook.
This has 3 separate discussions. Discussions need to be well thought and approximately a minimum of 250 words per discussion. Please cite relevant sources
Discussion 1 Existential theory:
How has existential thought changed counseling?
What are your thoughts about Existential Therapy?
Discussion 2 Person Centered Therapy:
After watching the video of Carl Rogers working with a client, what do you notice about Roger’s approach?
video:
https://ezproxy.usw.edu:8341/watch/carl-rogers-counsels-an-individual-on-hurt-and-anger-parts-1-2
Discussion 3 Behavioral Approach:
How could a client benefit from Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and/or Cognitive Therapy? From a personal perspective, how do you see the concepts explained in these theories applying to yourself? Please give an example.
ENG 123 Journal Guidelines and Rubric Overview: The journal activity in this course is private between you and the instructor. However, you will be discussing your work with your topic in future discussions with your peers. This week, you spent some time reflecting on persuasion in your everyday life, and you shared some potential topic ideas with your peers and instructor. But why is persuasion so important? Let’s think about that a little bit in this journal assignment. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
1. After exploring the Opposing Viewpoints Database and reviewing your brainstorming activity, identify two issues that are related to your career or degree:
a. Write a fully developed paragraph for issue one (5–8 sentences). i. Explain at least two clear arguable sides to the issue. ii. Explain how the issue relates to your field or degree, or your potential field or degree.
b. Write a fully developed paragraph for issue two (5–8 sentences). i. Explain at least two clear arguable sides to the issue. ii. Explain how the issue relates to your field or degree, or your potential field or degree.
2. After exploring the arguments related to your issues, take a moment to consider the bigger picture. Then, briefly reflect (in 1 to 2 paragraphs) on the
importance of persuasion for the issue you are most likely to write about. Be specific in your assignment; this information will help guide you as you work on your project in the coming weeks.
a. Identify which side you might argue if you plan to pursue this issue in your final persuasive essay. b. Identify your potential audience and why your topic would be relevant to them.
Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Submit the assignment as a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Issue One Identifies first potential issue that has two clear arguable sides and demonstrates relation to career or degree
Identifies the first potential issue, but it is missing information that explains the two clear arguable sides to the issue or does not demonstrate relation to career or degree
Does not clearly explain why the potential issue was chosen
25
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Issue Two Identifies second potential issue that has two clear arguable sides and demonstrates relation to career or degree
Identifies the second potential issue, but it is missing information that explains the two clear arguable sides to the issue, or does not demonstrate relation to career or degree
Does not clearly explain why the potential issue was chosen
25
Argue Identifies which side might be argued if this issue is pursued in final persuasive essay
Identifies which side might be argued if this issue is pursued in final persuasive essay, but lacks details or does not discuss relation to the potential topic
Does not identify which side might be argued
20
Audience Identifies potential audience and why topic would be relevant to them
Identifies potential audience and why topic would be relevant to them, but discussion contains inaccuracies or lacks details
Does not identify potential audience and does not discuss why topic would be relevant to them
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Talk to us support@bestqualitywriters.com
