Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on Differences between macro and micro. It needs to be at least 250 words. Micro vs Macro The basic difference between “micro” and “macro” is that micro is on a very small level and can be identified or observed while on the other hand macro is on a large level and cannot be easily identified or observed.

There are several micro and macro systems which have their own explanations, definitions and differences. Some of these systems are as follows.

a) Macro and micro economic.

b) Macro and micro analysis

c) Macro and micro evolutions

d) Macro and micro climates

e) Macro and micro influences.

There are many others in the list as well, but almost every one of these areas or fields have some basic resemblance while referencing to “macro” and “micro.”

For explaining the difference between macro and micro following are the two examples taken from two different fields.

Economics

The field of economic is divided in two parts i.e. macroeconomic and microeconomic. Microeconomics is the study of individual household’s behavior and&nbsp.decision making of firms on the distribution of limited resources. It can be simplified by saying that microeconomic is the study of markets. (Fogiel )

On the other hand macroeconomics is by and large focuses on nationwide or global economy. It mainly deals with the study of economic activity, and issues like inflation and growth and unemployment.

Evolution

Microevolution is a phenomenon that deals with the study of evolution of specie within its gene pool. For example, a dog having pups of unusual colors.

On the other hand macroevolution is the study of phenomenon in which a huge change occurs i.e. evolution of specie to newer specie. For example evolution of life from water, evolution of horse from a dog likes creature. Although these changes were never seen by anyone but still are being researched and studied.

Summary:

1. The common difference between macro and micro is that micro is defines relationships, and characteristics at very smaller level while macro define them to a broader scale.

2. One can observer macro changed while micro changes are not observed until they occurred.

Works Cited

Fogiel, M. Microeconomics. Piscataway, N.J: Research & Education Association,&nbsp.2000. Print.

Need an research paper on defining a line. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism. These all correlate with the way we think and act as people. In these terms, a line can be a shallow mind, hatred, ignorance, segregation, and an arrogant person. In essence, the word “line” almost always implies dissimilarities, divisions, and opposition in our world. A line is something that delineates boundaries and sets limits on the ideas, beliefs and actions of humankind.

A line is a shallow mind. Shallow minds are narrowly constricted and do not allow for any room for critical thinking and reasoning. They cannot see past one aspect of an idea, situation or problem. They could not comprehend the idea of a challenge thus they never really rise above that is asked of them. Their trend of thoughts is static and stale. If you feed a shallow mind with garbage information, then expect to get garbage information in return. A shallow mind is often restricted to living in a world without the more. Seeking the more is characteristic of a healthy, working mind that works off the beaten path. Therefore, a shallow mind lives in a world containing only the absence of the more. It recoils from the curvaceous and ever expanding path of deeper thought. Therefore, a shallow mind is a line.

When we think of hatred, we do not normally think of it as a line. However, if we take a closer look into nature of things, hatred limits the capacity of the mind to understand. It narrows down our way of thinking, thus hatred is a line. When you are angry, you draw a line. you close down your mind and channel your energies into one direction. Prejudice exemplifies a type of hatred. It is the persistence of racism that has emanated from ways of recognizing and classifying strangers. In the Medical Dictionary, hatred is defined as “an affection of the mind awakened by something regarded as evil.” The word “evil” is the key word.

Create a 2 pages page paper that discusses dissertation weekly progress report. Summary of Activities for the Week In order to arrive at a dissertation structure, I did some internet search of the possible presentation or appearance of a dissertation structure. My research for alternative ways of presenting the dissertation structure took me about one (1) hour..

As I was thinking about the better alternative to clarify the contents of my dissertation,

I chose the dissertation structure, wrote some contents after each major part, and spent me two (2 ) hours.

Then I worked on the project specification and found that it was possible for me to do a simultaneous Literature Review and drafting of the contents for the different parts of the project specification.

For Chapter 2- Outline of Project Environment, I found Sideridis and Patrikakis (2010) as the reference for one characteristic of democracy. This took up one (1) hour to find and to be utilized in actually drafting contents.

I also found Paivarinta & Saebo (2008) which discussed another quality of democracy which enlightened me some more. It takes time to discover new information worth adding. Some books don’t show all pages. This took me another one (1) hour to find and write about.

An additional insight about democracy was also discovered in Clark (2002). This took me another one (1) hour of reading, understanding, and summarizing for inclusion in the contents.

Search for some information about Oman was easier Thus for Chapter 2, the source (Ashrafi and Murtaza, 2008), and for Chapter 3-The Problem to be Solved, the Majlis A’Shura (2010) took only minutes to reach. What consumed my time was the composition of more contents using those references. Combined, I utilized another one (1) hour for this.

To elaborate on the contents of Chapter 4-Breakdown of Task, some intense thinking was necessary, especially when it came to composing the draft contents of various tasks, There are many tasks involved. They had to be organized in their presentation. All these processes of thinking, organizing, and composing the contents of several pages took me two (2) hours.

Attending to the drafting of Chapter 5- Project Deliverables and Chapter 6- Requirements made me think even further ahead about what might be the desirable outcome of the dissertation, aside from research work and literature reviews. The primary data is supposed to serve a purpose to confirm or negate the hypothesis. If findings affirm, then the project should deliver a recommended website and proposed structural framework showing how it should improve participation of the people in E-Government. But how this should look like still depends on discoveries. These thoughts consumed my mind for more than one (1) hour.

Speaking of primary data gathering, Chapter 7- Legal, Ethical, Professional, and Social Issues, I decided to draft the contents of these as well since I was thinking of what Oman officials needed and how I was going to extract those information. The MPs are VIPs. They must be very busy. Pondering on these and writing the draft of the contents of this chapter took me another one (1) hour.

Chapter 8-Facilities and Resources and Chapter 9-Project Plan required imagination based on the desired results identified in Chapters 5 and 6. No literature review was needed for this. It needed something more practical. The composition of these two parts took more than one (1) hour.

Towards the end of my accounting and weekly reporting, I noticed that my project specification outline did not exactly match my Literature Review file. There was no part for the literature review in the project specification. But I saw many other results of my research within the Literature Review file. These include Lansford (2007) and Tilly (2007) both of which have some discussions about the concept of democracy. There was also Woolfe and Rawcliffe (2007) who mentioned a limitation of democracy, and Kubicek and Westholm (2003) who define E-democracy. I had also jotted down Council of Europe (2009), The Scottish Parliament (2012), Seaton (2005), Parliament of Canada (2012) and the OECD (2012) for their observations about E-democracy. So what I did was to transform my notes into a draft of these Literature Review. All these took me three (3) hours.

By next week, I plan to

Organize and complete the major headings with their anticipated subheadings. This will require some forward thinking, given the fact that I have not yet gathered much information from more sources of literatures. At least two (2) hours will be needed to allow me to focus on what to look for.

My other plan is to start attending to the primary research by creating the set of questionnaires and communicating to respondents who can answer the questionnaires. But this will just be a dry run to see how the potential respondents might respond. This might take eight (8) hours of trying to get the respondents to reply or finding out how to make them reply.

If there will still be time available, I will be looking for relevant books, journals, articles that talk about the principles, concepts, theories of E-government, E-democracy, preferably those with presentation of theoretical frameworks. This will need many hours, at least 3 hours so I can find theoretical frameworks and have an idea about what my theoretical framework should look like. All these will take maybe another eight (8) hours.

Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on mao zedong’s legacy Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! Some of the negative roles played by Mao Zedong include the launching of the cultural revolution where millions of people were forcefully made to do manual labor, which in return resulted to execution of tens of thousands Culture Revolution2. To date, people all over the world still visit Tiananmen Square, the burial place of Mao Zedong in order to pay homage to one person that even in his death still revere him. The essay will relay information about Mao Zedong and the reason why decades after his death, his name is still as powerful as ever.

Mao Zedong, commonly known as Chairman Mao, was one of the most influential thinkers ever to rule China. Chairman Mao is known for his contribution in a number of factors especially in the republic of china. Apart from being the founder of People’s Republic of China (PRC), Mao is also the man behind numerous developments and achievements in China such improving China’s economy from agrarian to industrial level3. In China, Mao helped improve the level of education and it is through him that the republic of China is known to produce some of the most brilliant brains in the world. Apart from improving china’s education standard, Chairman Mao oversaw gender equality in China by ensuring that Chinese women had equal opportunities in any field such as education, employment and politics4. It was also during Mao Zedong’s reign that china experienced one of the highest population growth from 550 to 900 million.

Although Mao Zedong’s good reputation is recognized all over the world, Mao’s legacy is also despised by a many people. This is because of the role he played during the Cultural Revolution that lasted for 10 years resulting to massive loss of lives. One of the reasons behind Mao’s initiation of the revolution program was in a move to eliminate counter-revolutionary in china, a process that took ten years5.