Business Finance Homework Help

Option #1: Organizational Problem or Opportunity

Think about a specific problem or opportunity in your organization, your community, your professional association, or your social organization.

This week you will determine which theory from scholarly literature most aligns with your own study. You will create a theoretical framework section of your proposal in which you state the theory, discuss the background of the theory, and why it is an appropriate framework for your own proposed study.

Your framework should be 4-5-pages in length (excluding cover page and references) and formatted according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). You must include a minimum of six credible, academic or professional references. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

Option #2: Industry Specific Problem or Opportunity

Think about an industry specific problem or opportunity you have observed relevant to organizational leadership.

This week you will determine which theory from scholarly literature most aligns with your own study. You will create a theoretical framework section of your proposal in which you state the theory, discuss the background of the theory, and why it is an appropriate framework for your own proposed study.

Your framework should be 4-5-pages in length (excluding cover page and references) and formatted according to the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). You must include a minimum of six credible, academic or professional references. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

15 to >11.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The paper includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

11 to >8.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

25 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources reference key concepts from the module with in-text citations to support answers.

20 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

15 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

10 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

20 to >15.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

15 to >10.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

10 to >5.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

5 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less?than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the case study.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates graduate-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 90