Checklist: Do not use a standard essay format. Provide each component clearly and distinctly.

1. Two paragraphs comparing two selected documents.
2. One thesis statement
3. One discussion question

WORD LIMIT

300-400.

Content Expectations:

• Step ONE: Identify the nature of the source material. Which readings are primary or secondary sources? Are they fictional works or do they present any evident bias?
• Step TWO: Choose TWO READINGS from the assigned documents to perform a compare/contrast analysis.  Video material is not acceptable in this assignment.
  • If you choose a primary and a secondary source, then think about how the primary source fits into the narrative/position of the secondary source.
  • If you choose two primary sources, then compare how they represent different viewpoints or perspectives on important issues.
  • If there is only one assigned reading, then extract two meaningful examples instead of comparisons.
• Step THREE: Draw TWO meaningful comparisons between the two documents that reveals important insight into the historical period/topic of the week. The comparison may be any similarity or difference, but should focus on explaining how it helps historians understand the past. Think about how and why things happened the way they did. Figure out what you think is the most significant SIMILARITY between the two passages.
  • Consider the author’s perspective (national origin, class, ideology etc) for each document.
• STEP FOUR: If these documents were the source material for your research project, what would your preliminary research question or thesis statement be? This should be no more than two sentences and cover the main idea that you would try to argue.
  • Ex. Using the works of Robespierre and St. Just, this paper will argue that the violence of the French Revolution was created by their interpretation of the needs of the French nation rather than their philosophical beliefs.
  • Be ambitious but with limits. Lay out a provable case that makes a strong a point, regardless of whether you are fully convinced that it is the case. You will be evaluated on the composition and effect of the ideas rather than the perfectness of the answer.
• Step FIVE: Create one discussion question that you can propose to the class during seminar. It should be a ‘why’ problem that poses an issue for debate rather than demanding a specific factual answer. Ex. ‘Why didn’t Frankenstein name the Creature?” instead of “Did Frankenstein name the Creature?”
• Do NOT use quotations or paraphrase the document. You may refer to specific passages but do not summarize the document. “ex. Where Thomas Paine talked about hereditary right, he was focused on the legitimacy of an absolute monarchy.” The paper should consist entirely of your own ideas and opinions about the sources using a compare/contrast approach. Therefore, citations should never be required. If you do quote/paraphrase then include citations.

READINGS-

CHOOSE ONLY 2.

Avalon Project – Treaty of Westphalia (yale.edu)

Internet History Sourcebooks (fordham.edu)

Internet History Sourcebooks (fordham.edu)

Describe the standard-setting process for auditing. How does this process differ from the standard-setting process for accounting?

You are a CPA in practice at a local CPA firm working with individual tax clients. A client comes into your office and says that she has her own business but doesn’t want to report all of her income. Considering your risk, the risk to your client, and ethical considerations, what should you tell her? Remember to include research on the subject.

There are two primary places to get information on the tax research question. One is the AICPA professional ethics area and the other is the IRS. Please try to quote both in your answers. If you are in professional practice or have access to one of the professional tax research libraries, then those would be great as well.

Auditing Research:
Here is a recent article on auditing from AICPA’s Journal of Accountancy.  You can get access to this material for free and have it delivered to your email.

https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2021/feb/new-standards-drive-toward-better-audits.html?utm_source=mnl:cpald&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=08Feb2021

Remember to use proper APA references and citations in all of your work. 500 words.

Write a paper of 1,250-1,500 words that discusses the team-based approaches to the delivery of health services. The focus of the paper should be one type of health care environment, such as a hospital, primary care, or long-term care facility. Within your paper, be sure to do the following:

1. Present a patient case (this does not need to be detailed).
2. Describe the collaborative team that would deliver care and their individual roles, including credentialing, licensing, and regulation.
3. Identify and describe the indicators and determinants of health that would influence or impact this case.
4. Describe the impact this collaborative team-based approach would have on management and line staff.
5. Explain key financial and resource challenges for consumers and insurance companies as they apply to this model. Explain how the resource challenges may affect the collaborative team.
6. From a leadership position, explain the advantages of using a collaborative team-based approach.

Support your writing with three to five scholarly peer-reviewed resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.