Government homework help

/in /by

What are some key considerations for interagency cooperation that influence the Commander and Joint Task Forces Commander in the development/execution of operations?  Also, describe one of the interagency and why it is important as a future SGM/CSM to understand interagency cooperation.
Post a substantial initial response, with at least 2 cited sources and a minimum of 250 words, to the topic below. Identify references following the post using APA format.

Government homework help

/in /by

Instructions 
Due on Monday December 21, 2020
Part II
Multi-year Budget Evaluation
This assignment is the second of a three-part process. Part III will be completed in Unit VIII.
Using the California state budget from Part I in the previous unit, evaluate the past three years’ allocation of public goods. Develop an analysis including the following:

  • Evaluate goals and priorities of the local government goods and services.
  • Assess internal and external challenges for providing goods and services.
  • Evaluate budget stabilization measures.
  • Provide recommendations.

Your report should consist of no less than two pages, and all sources utilized should be cited and referenced using APA style. Please ensure that you include a cover page and reference page. Remember that the cover page and reference page are not included in the page expectation.
Resources

Government homework help

/in /by
Instructions
DUE FRIDAY DECEMBER 18, 2020 
AT NOON PST
For the Unit II Case Study, you will focus on fires and fire prevention in your community, specifically structural fires and wildfires. Start by conducting research around your community/location for examples of mitigation and fire prevention, such as sprinkler systems, emergency fire exits, or fire hydrants. Take photographs (ok to use pics found on internet) of what you find so that you can show your professor what your area has done to address the issue of fires.
Using what you learned about your community and what you learned about past fires from this course, write a case study, a minimum of four pages in length, that addresses the following points:

  • Explain what has been done with regard to      mitigation, recovery, and/or response efforts within your community. When      looking for potential threats, consider wildlands, explosions, or home      fires, and, for mitigation, examples include building codes and      fireproofing.
  • Explain who conducted these efforts and      the vulnerabilities they faced in their community, and include the role      these individuals or groups play with mitigating, responding, and/or      recovering from the risk.
  • Examine the causes and recovery efforts of      at least one past fire that either occurred in your community or that you      have researched. Explain the causes and contributing factors of this fire.
  • Examine the vulnerability in a larger      context. Considering past fires, either in your community or surrounding      areas, do you feel your community has done enough to prevent future fires?      Why, or why not? What recommendations can you offer to your community to      address future risks?
  • Consider vulnerability theory and use it      to help you explain how your community may be vulnerable to fire, followed      by systems theory to help you discuss the systems (organizations,      policies, procedures, etc.) in place to mitigate the fire hazard.

Your paper should be a minimum of four pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages. You are required to use a minimum of three outside sources as part of your case study. All sources, including the textbook, must be cited and referenced according to APA guidelines.
Additionally, include at least four visual aids/images that support your content (one 4-by-4-inch image per page maximum). Please incorporate those into your paper in APA format.

Government homework help

/in /by
two responses (the “Final Posts”) of at least 200 words each to classmates
Q1
I personally do not believe that a bussiness owner has the right to deny service to same-sex couples. These are progressive times and the world has been coming to accept all different kinds of people over the years. Just because slavery was permitted under law a hundred or so years ago did not make it right. The law is not always correct or moral. We now have corrected that notion and have implented all people into society regardless of skin color. The same should be true for same-sex couples.
Using the argument of religion as an objection to bake a wedding cake for gay marraige means that African-Americans should still be objected under the same logic. The religon is not the problem in this case it is the problem of a person that is unwilling to adapt to society or accept anyone that is different from themselves. The “KKK” Is nowhere near the same as a same-sex couple. The “KKK” is a harmful organization that is hateful and disriminatory. Same sex couples do no harm to anyone and are just trying to express their individual sexuality. Opposition of same-sex couples is similar to a hateful/discriminatory organization and maybe in that case people should not be working for weddings if they are opposed to any type of gender getting married.
The fact that this kind of behaviour is not outlawed can be considered a paralell from dicrimation of Africation americans during segregation. Eventually it was adopted by the government as public opinion gained tracion in favor towards equality of skin color. The same will happen with gay marraige over the years as public opinion towards it has increased tremendously over the years. Aporximately 10,000,000 people in the United States are considered part of LGBT so this issue definetly is not small. Not giving rights to a certain group of people is basically admitting that they are less than anyone else in society when this is false.
I hope to one day see a world where skin color, race, sexuality and any other types of human discrepancies are not an issue in day to day society and we can all live in harmony and peace as under one label of people/citizens of America all protected under equal law.
Question2
No, business owners and/or government officials should not be allowed to deny service to same-sex couples because of religious beliefs. Yes, we have the right of freedom of religion, whether it be Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, or no religion at all. Yet our government was also founded on the idea of separation of church and state. So why is it acceptable to allow Christianity to govern us, when fundamentally our government is supposed to respect the separation of church and state.
“He does not have the absolute right to exercise and practice such beliefs in utter disregard of the clear constitutional rights of other citizens.” That is the best line I have heard and gets right to the core of this issue, and I will definitely be using it in the future. Members of the LQBTQ+ community have the right to be happy, should have the right to the same services as straight people, and absolutely should have the right to be themselves. You can feel one way about something, but if that belief goes against the rights of others, you can not practice that belief because it interferes with someone elses rights.
I think (and hope) that the case with the wedding cake will result in the motion that refusing to bake a cake for same sex marriage is inherently discrimination. If a bakery were to turn down a woman who wanted a cake because she is a woman, that would be discrimination. I cannot be refused service from a place because I am a woman. A black person can not be turned down from a restaurant just because of the color of their skin. Everyone has the right to live the exact same way as everyone else. LGBTQ+ people have the absolute right to be with the ones they love, and celebrate it too. Personally, if I was gay I would want to go to a bakery that supported me. I don’t want to give my business to someone who is disrespectful to who I am.
I am honestly amazed at how we are in 2020, almost 2021, and same sex marriage is still an issue. If you are arguing against the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals, remember that the Bible calls us to love everyone.

Government homework help

/in /by
For this assignment, you will choose a topic (assisted suicide, abortion, immigration, welfare, etc.) that can lead to political controversy. In 750-1,000 words, do the following:
1.  Explain both sides of the political argument through ethical analysis.
2.  Recommend how policy makers can reconcile differing wishes of the public. What is the importance of public participation in politicians passing controversial policy, such as the one chosen?
3.  Describe how aspects of a Christian worldview might inform the approach policy makers take to create public policies in a situation such as the one chosen.
Use two to three scholarly resources to support your explanations.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Government homework help

/in /by
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/video/yale-historian-warns-about-the-rise-of-tyranny-in-the-us/ 
1.) What does the video indicate was our founding father’s safeguards against tyranny in the United States?  What do you think about Mr. Snyder’s assertions regarding the current administration?
2.) What was the founding father’s notion of the concept of “rule of law”, according to the video?  What does Mr. Snyder believe is happening to that concept today?  Do you agree or disagree?  Explain.
3.) What is the role of the media, per our textbook?  Do you agree with the assertion that today’s media is not necessarily “fact-based”?  Explain your answer.
4.) Lastly, what are your overall thoughts on the video you watched?

Government homework help

/in /by
  Assignment Content

Read The Case of Joe the Jerk (or, the Very Capable Jerk) document.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper from Joan’s perspective outlining the best ways to address her dilemma with Joe.
Include the following:

  • Evaluate how Joan has utilized her role to ensure that lower-level management upholds their position in creating a positive environment. In what ways has Joan been effective, and in what ways could she improve?
  • Describe how Joan might use motivation techniques to assist in creating the best environment for the organization. Include financial and nonfinancial techniques.
  • Describe how Joan may work with individuals in various levels of the organizational structure to deal with her dilemma with Joe and maximize her power in the situation.
  • Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Government homework help

/in /by

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/video/yale-historian-warns-about-the-rise-of-tyranny-in-the-us/ 
1.) What does the video indicate was our founding father’s safeguards against tyranny in the United States?  What do you think about Mr. Snyder’s assertions regarding the current administration?
2.) What was the founding father’s notion of the concept of “rule of law”, according to the video?  What does Mr. Snyder believe is happening to that concept today?  Do you agree or disagree?  Explain.
3.) What is the role of the media, per our textbook?  Do you agree with the assertion that today’s media is not necessarily “fact-based”?  Explain your answer.
4.) Lastly, what are your overall thoughts on the video you watched?

Government homework help

/in /by
Question
The Death penalty is nowadays an expression that is used in justice for a case of someone who has committed a very serious crime. some years ago Death penalty was  really hard as a punishment for condamning a criminal to receive death as a punishment for his or her crimes committed. this may be a good option for those who have been victims, but for some other such as family members of the person who has committed the crime, this decicion will not make them happy because despite the fact that their family member committed a crime, he or she  is still a human being and deserves some rights.
Now with the presence of human right organization, the Death penalty is no longer the same as it was in the past, because their are so many other ways to punish someone who has committed a crime. however, the death penalty depends on one country to another. for some country the death penalty still remain death as punishment, for example, the criminal must be killed using a gun shot, or bullet; some other must be killed by being hanged. for some african traditions, the criminal was burried alive, that decisions made other people to fear committing crimes, but so many people complained about it and the decision was changed.
For other country now, the death penalty has changed the way of its punishment, the criminal will no longer be killed, but will receive a life imprisonment.
In my own opinion, somewhat i support and i do not support. on this hand if i say i support, this means that when this punishment is being executed, so many people will have fear of commiting crimes and the level of crimes will reduce for no one like to die. on the other hand, i do not support death penalty because it is to hard to bear it, if i could imagine that the criminal is my family member, despite the evil did i will prefer him to get jaiilled for life than being eliminated forever, in prison there will be a way to see him.
Texas and US shouldn’t carry out the death penalty but they must find out what punishment is good for such crime committed, some crime despite being crimes do not deserve a death penalty, criminal can go do farm works while being in prison.
Question 2
In my opinion, I think the death penalty should be abolished because of many reasons. Many people believe the saying ‘an eye for an eye’. But when people will realize that just because someone may have killed a loved one does not mean the best way for that person is to die also. People do not realize that they are putting the blood of another person life on their hands. This makes them just as guilty as the person who committed the crime: the only difference is that they did not use weapon except their mouth to kill them. The death penalty should be abolished because it is racist, punished the poor, condemns those who are innocent to death, and is a cruel punishment
The death penalty is irreversible. Absolute judgements may lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit. Texas man Cameron Todd Willingam was executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his three daughters. Following his execution, further evidence revealed that Willingam did not set the fire that caused their deaths but it came too late.
We can deny that the death penalty makes a public spectacle of an individual’s death. It means executions are often undertaken in an extremely public manner, with public hangings in Iran or live broadcasts of lethal injections in the US. According to UN human rights experts, executions in public serve no legitimate purpose and only increase the cruel, inhuman and degrading nature of this punishment.
Everyone always has the right to live, and we all have the right to be free from cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. These are human rights that people have, regardless of whether they have been convicted of crimes. The death penalty violates these basic rights.
complete at least two responses (the “Final Posts”) of at least 200 words each to classmates