Please find the Paper for the article critique in the attached files.

Critical analysis of journal article summary

The critique should be of 1.5 pages with a text of no more than 500 words excluding references with a font of Times New Roman and size of 12. The line spacing should be 1.5.

The purpose of writing a critique is to assess the quality of work carried out by others and also for having a better understanding. The critical analysis of a journal article requires a critical reading and writing.

The students may use the following sample questions whichever applicable as basic guidelines for critiquing a journal article in health sciences:

Ten questions to ask when critically appraising a research article:

1. Is the study question relevant?

2. Does the study add anything new?

3. What type of research question is being asked?

4. Was the study design appropriate for the research question?

5. Did the study methods address the most important potential sources of bias?

6. Was the study performed according to the original protocol?

7. Does the study test a stated hypothesis?

8. Were the statistical analyses performed correctly?

9.Do the data justify the conclusions?

10. Are there any conflicts of interest?

I need support with this Health & Medical question so I can learn better.

1-           Share three ways a teacher might ensure the success of conferences with families.

2-Describe two areas in which cultural differences may affect  child-rearing practices within families and provide an example for each  practice you have selected. 

Research Topic: Oral Health

Identify your target population (for instance, age or other demographic, aggregate population); this must be in your city or state. ( city is Fort Lauderdale, state is Florida)

Discuss population-based health education interventions for your target population that is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality for the problem. Be sure to review the research literature and HP2020 for interventions.

Identify how and what data for interventions is being tracked.

In a four (4) page paper, address the following. Refer to rubric for expanded details related to grading expectations.

Identify the problem in the introduction section.

Provide an overview of the problem in your state/national.

Review of descriptive epidemiological and demographic data on mortality/morbidity and risk.

HP2020: Present the goal, overview and objectives of Healthy People 2020 for the paper topic.

Population level prevention and health promotion review. Describe population and/or primary health care focused interventions. Use of scholarly literature and HP2020 is required. There should be direct correlation to evidence for all strategies. 

Oral Health: Indigenous Population

https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/oral-health (Links to an external site.)

https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/law-and-health-policy/topic/disability-and-health/improving-health-outcomes-for-american-indian-and-alaska-native-people-with-disabilities (Links to an external site.)

https://www.ihs.gov/newsroom/factsheets/disparities/ (Links to an external site.)

https://www.nicoa.org/elder-resources/health-disparities/ (Links to an external site.)

https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/omh/browse.aspx?lvl=3&lvlid=62

For this paper you must cite and reference 2 sources. The paper should be 2–3 pages and written using current APA format. Your paper should address the following:

a. How would you prepare for the following situation? (provide realistic examples and details for safety and survival)

(Scenario) At this moment, you are sitting at home working on your WCU class. Suddenly, the National Weather Bureau sends an alert across your cell phone—a tornado is headed your way. You have 15 minutes before touchdown in your neighborhood. What is your plan? This is a ‘shelter in place’ scenario, you cannot outrun the tornado. Identify a safe place in your home to take shelter.

You must include research. Cite and reference two sources and explain the recommended safety measures in a tornado emergency and how you would apply them to your specific living arrangements.

b. How prepared are you in the event of a disaster? Describe your level of disaster preparedness using specific examples and references to your “go-bag” and preparedness checklist assignments.

Example: “I am more prepared for a water-related disaster than a fire-related disaster even though I live in a highly secluded, forested area. I have a boat as transportation in the event of flooding, but I do not have rain barrels or fire barrier supplies on hand.”

Example: “There were many missing items on my preparedness checklist. I realized that I do not own a flashlight. If I had to use my phone as a light it would drain the battery very quickly.

c. Reflect on how prepared you were before this class and compare it with how prepared you are now.

• Have you acquired any new emergency items?
• Do you plan to take any additional trainings or certification courses?
• Have you shared your knowledge with friends and family?

Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.

NURS 431 OL Family Disaster Plan Summative Assessment

NURS 431 OL Family Disaster Plan Summative Assessment

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario Response (Prompt a)	135 to >120.15 pts Responds clearly, thoroughly, and eloquently to the assignment scenario. The response is reflective and insightful. The response includes detail that exhibits a firm understanding of the course content. All content is accurate and/or supported. Provides several specific examples: Identifies a safe place in home to shelter in place. Identifies realistic safety measures and survival strategies. Includes two sources cited and referenced to support safety and survival strategies. 120.15 to >101.25 pts Responds thoroughly and effectively to the assignment scenario. The response includes some detail, but some ideas may be vague, incomplete, or lacking in insight. The response suggests an adequate understanding of the course content. Almost all content is accurate and/or supported. Provides a few specific examples: Identifies a safe place in home to shelter in place. Identifies a few realistic safety measures and survival strategies. Includes two sources cited and referenced, but they may not clearly support the safety and survival strategies presented. 101.25 to >79.65 pts Does not respond adequately to the assignment scenario. The response is vague and lacking in detail. The response suggests a vague understanding of the course content. Much of the content is inaccurate and/or unsupported. Provides one example: Identifies a safe place in home to shelter in place or identifies realistic safety measures and survival strategies. Includes one source to support safety and survival strategies. 79.65 to >0 pts Does not respond to the assignment scenario, or is off-topic. No sources are cited or referenced.	135 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLevel of Disaster Preparedness and Reflection (Prompts b and c)	135 to >120.15 pts Evaluates one’s level of preparedness by thoroughly and thoughtfully reflecting on the Assignment Checklist items and categories. Draws conclusions and makes reasonable predictions. Provides specific examples from one’s personal situation to support the evaluation with evidence. Reflects thoughtfully and in-depth on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course, offering examples and details for evidence. 120.15 to >101.25 pts Evaluates one’s level of preparedness by thoughtfully reflecting on the Assignment Checklist items and categories. Draws conclusions. Provides general examples to support the evaluation. Reflects on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course. 101.25 to >79.65 pts Evaluates one’s level of preparedness, but does not refer to the Assignment Checklist items and categories. Does not draw conclusions. Provides general examples, but they are inadequate in supporting the evaluation. Does not reflect on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course, or is vague in reflection. 79.65 to >0 pts Does not respond to the assignment, or is off-topic.	135 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA	30 to >26.7 pts The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free of errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are correctly cited and referenced. 26.7 to >22.5 pts The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are correctly cited and referenced. 22.5 to >17.7 pts The assignment does not consistently follow current APA format. There are several APA mistakes and/or several grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. A few sources are correctly cited and referenced. 17.7 to >0 pts The assignment does not follow current APA format. Most sources are incorrectly cited and referenced, or are missing.	30 pts
Total Points: 300