What are the demographics of the majority of people covered by Medicaid, and how many people in the U.S. are covered by Medicaid?

Assignment 2: ACA

 

Over the next few weeks, you will explore many of the critical components of the Patient Protection and ACA. Each week, a different provision will be introduced. Your assignments will include researching the provision and explaining the changes that will occur with the Patient Protection and ACA.

 

“Medicaid”

 

The U.S. created Medicaid, a publically funded healthcare program, to assist people in obtaining healthcare services. This week, explore Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Answer the following questions:

 

Tasks:

 

(1) What legislation introduced Medicaid, and what are the funding sources for the program?

(2) What are some of the changes, including CHIP, that have occurred to the Medicaid program since its inception?

(3) What are the demographics of the majority of people covered by Medicaid, and how many people in the U.S. are covered by Medicaid?

(4) Describe the changes that will occur in Medicaid with the ACA.

Submit your answers in a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word document. Support your answers with appropriate examples and research.

 

Cite all references in APA format.

 

Submission Details:

By Friday, May 20, 2016, submit your report to the W2 Assignment 2 Turnitin.

Cite the sources in APA format.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Explained the legislation that created Medicaid and the funding sources for the program.

10

Identified some of the changes, including CHIP, that have occurred to the Medicaid program since its inception.

10

Explained the demographics of the majority of people covered by Medicaid and how many people in the U.S. are covered by Medicaid.

10

Described the changes that will occur in Medicaid with the ACA.

15

Used correct spelling, grammar, and vocabulary. Cited all sources using APA format.

5

Total:

 

50

Identify the population (number, demographics, etc.) of uninsured people in the U.S.

Dropbox Assignment

Assignment 3: Dropbox Assignment( 3-4 pages).

 

Over the next few weeks, you will explore many of the critical components of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Each week, a different provision will be introduced. Your assignments will include researching the provision and explaining the changes that will occur with the ACA.

 

The ACA: The Uninsured Population in the U.S.

 

Hernandez, Fornos, Mika, Urbanksy, and Villarreal (2009) reported the following:

 

“Lack of health insurance has detrimental effects on the health and well-being of people and creates financial pressure on health care institutions. Uninsured adults are more likely to postpone health care and are less able to afford prescription drugs or follow through with recommended treatments than the insured. The consequences to reduced access to care can be severe, particularly when preventable conditions go untreated.”

 

Reference:

 

Hernandez, G. B., Fornos, L. B., Mika, V. S., Urbanksy, K., & Villarreal, R.

(2009). One regional health system’s innovative steps to deal with the

uninsured. Journal of Health Care Finance, 36(1), 70–84.

 

Click the following link to learn about America’s uninsured population:

 

Who Are the Uninsured? An Analysis of America’s Uninsured Population, Their Characteristics and Their Health

 

O’Neil and O’Neil (2009) also published a comprehensive study in which they arrive at the following conclusion:

 

“We find as have others, that lack of health insurance is not likely to be the major factor causing higher mortality rates among the uninsured. The uninsured—particularly the involuntarily uninsured—have multiple disadvantages that in themselves are associated with poor health.”

 

Reference:

 

O’Neil, J., & O’Neil, D. (2009). Who are the uninsured? An analysis of

America’s uninsured population, their characteristics and their

health. Retrieved from http://www.epionline.org/studies/oneill_06-

2009.pdf

 

Tasks:

 

In this assignment, you will explore the uninsured population in the U.S. On the basis of the knowledge gained from your readings and Internet research, respond to the following:

 

Identify the population (number, demographics, etc.) of uninsured people in the U.S.

Discuss some of the reasons for and possible financial consequences of not having health insurance.

Discuss the socioeconomic consequences of having a large uninsured population in the U.S.

Describe the changes that will occur to assist the uninsured population with the Patient Protection and ACA.

Submission Details:

 

By Friday, May 13, 2016, submit your report to the W1 Assignment 3 Turnitin.

Cite the sources in APA format.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Identified the population of uninsured people in the U.S.

5

Discussed some reasons for and consequences of not having health insurance.

5

Discussed socioeconomic consequences of having a large uninsured population.

10

Described the changes via the Patient Protection and ACA that will assist the uninsured population.

20

Justified ideas and responses by using appropriate examples and references from texts, websites, and other references.

5

Used correct spelling, grammar, and vocabulary. Cited the sources in APA format.

What is your reaction to this article as a consumer of healthcare services? In answering this question, note how the article uses language and any persuasive techniques.

Assignment 1: Discussion Assignment

This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by 18th, 2016.

To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite sources in your responses to other classmates.

Mass Media and Healthcare Quality, in this assignment, you will assess how the general public’s perception of healthcare quality is influenced by the mass media.

“Locate an article that reports on the quality of healthcare services. The article must be sourced from the mass media and not from an academic or healthcare journal. The purpose of this assignment is to review information reported to the general public in a news source that does not exclusively cover healthcare issues. Weekly magazines, such as Time, Newsweek, US News and World Report, Forbes, Money, and Consumer Reports, and newspapers, such as the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, would be appropriate choices. The article may give various examples of good or bad quality instead of covering just one episode of care. Your selected article must be a comprehensive review or assessment of some aspect of healthcare services. Summarize the article. Be certain to indicate the basis for the report, that is, whether it is the result of academic research, an independent investigation, or something else”.

Answer the following questions.

(1) In the article, what conditions, processes, or events are noted as good quality or poor quality healthcare? What is your own assessment of these conditions, processes, or events? Explain.

(2) Does the article assign responsibility to persons or processes for the problems or achievements it reports? Does it provide sufficient evidence for assigning responsibility? Why do you think so?

(3) What are the suggestions for healthcare quality improvement in the article?

(4) What is your reaction to this article as a consumer of healthcare services? In answering this question, note how the article uses language and any persuasive techniques.

(5) What is your reaction to this article as a provider of healthcare services? Why is this reaction the same as or different from your reaction as a consumer?

(6) Is the article fair in its reporting and assessing healthcare quality? Why or why not?

Provide reasons and evidence in support of your responses.

Comment on the postings of two of your classmates. Is your assessment the same or different? Why?

Be sure to cite any relevant resources used in framing your responses. Apply APA standards to cite sources.

Presents the grading criteria and rubric for this assignment. Maximum Points

Quality of initial posting 50

Participation in discussion 25

Writing mechanics (spelling, grammar, APA) and information literacy 25

Total 100

) How will different circumstances impact performance measurement when it is based on relative rank and absolute levels? Support with examples.

 

Assignment 1: Discussion Assignment

 

The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

 

For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by Monday, April 11th, 2016.

 

To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

 

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion.

 

Multiple Performance Measurement Standards

 

Read the following article:

 

Safavi, K. S. (2006). The measurement conundrum. Journal of Healthcare

Management, 51(5), 287–290.

 

In the article, Safavi (2006, p. 290) asks: “Is the goal to establish relative rank or absolute levels of performance?” Safavi also states that the basic dilemma in selecting a measurement system is whether “to judge performance from the outside or to improve performance from the inside” (p. 287).

 

Discuss the following from the perspective of a provider:

 

(1) Assuming the measurement system is intended to judge the performance from outside, evaluate the use of a standard based on relative rank and absolute levels of performance. Which one would you use? Why or why not?

(2) Assuming the measurement system is intended to judge the performance from inside, evaluate the use of a standard based on relative rank and absolute levels of performance. Which one would you use? Why or why not?

(3) How will different circumstances impact performance measurement when it is based on relative rank and absolute levels? Support with examples.

Justify your responses using examples.

 

Presents the grading criteria and rubric for this assignment.                        Maximum Points

Quality of initial posting                                                                                                        50

Participation in discussion                                                                                                      25

Writing mechanics (spelling, grammar, APA) and information literacy                         25

Total

Identified all the criteria that you would use to determine whether synesthesia is a disorder or a variation of normal sensation and perception.

Case Study

From your course textbook Case Workbook to Accompany Human Genetics: Concepts and Applications, read the case studies provided in the following chapters:

  • “Overview of Genetics”
  • “Cells”

In a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document, create a work sheet by answering the Questions for Research and Discussion provided for each case study. (Do not answer the multiple-choice questions).

Cite any sources in APA format.

Submission Details

Name your document SU_BIO3344_W1_A3_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Submit your document to the W1 Assignment 3 Dropbox by Tuesday, June 21, 2016.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Submitted the document for the case study in “Overview of Genetics” and it addressed the points given below:

  • Identified all the criteria that you would use to determine whether synesthesia is a disorder or a variation of normal sensation and perception.
  • Described the reasons why synesthesia is more common in the present scenario.
  • Determined the possible reasons for infants to have synesthesia.
  • Analyzed and justified whether you would consider a genetic test to confirm synesthesia.
  • Analyzed and determined whether synesthesia should be regarded as a learning disability, an advantage, or neither.
20
Submitted the document for the case study in “Cells” and it addressed the points given below:

  • Analyzed and justified whether human male can breastfeed and described the conditions that must be provided to coax a male body to produce and secrete milk.
  • Compared the milk composition of various mammals and determined why the proportion of milk components is consistent with the animal’s behavior.
  • Described the roles of mitosis and apoptosis in remodeling Sheila’s breast from a fatty sac to an active milk gland.

https://digitalbookshelf.southuniversity.edu/#/books/0077461576/cfi/4!/4/2/2@0:0

 

https://digitalbookshelf.southuniversity.edu/#/books/1259623602/cfi/6/28!/4/2/2@0:0

What specific skills and knowledge that you gained through this course will be most important as you take on your future roles in nursing? Describe a concrete way in which you anticipate using these skills and knowledge.

What specific skills and knowledge that you gained through this course will be most important as you take on your future roles in nursing? Describe a concrete way in which you anticipate using these skills and knowledge.

this is the course:

Adv Rsrch Method:Evidense-based Practice

This course provides the scientific basis for the analysis and use of research to further develop the knowledge base and skill sets required to maximize evidence-based practice in healthcare settings. Students conduct an in-depth analysis of research methods as a framework for studying clinical issues. Students build on their knowledge of the research process, with an emphasis on analyzing the components, problems and issues related to nursing and other disciplines; finding, evaluating and critiquing available literature; and critically evaluating qualitative and quantitative research methods, including design, sampling, data-collection strategies, measurement and interpretation of results. All of these skills allow students to evaluate and critique findings to enhance evidence-based nursing practice, including dissemination of findings. Ethical issues are also addressed throughout the course.

this is the course:

Adv Rsrch Method:Evidense-based Practice

This course provides the scientific basis for the analysis and use of research to further develop the knowledge base and skill sets required to maximize evidence-based practice in healthcare settings. Students conduct an in-depth analysis of research methods as a framework for studying clinical issues. Students build on their knowledge of the research process, with an emphasis on analyzing the components, problems and issues related to nursing and other disciplines; finding, evaluating and critiquing available literature; and critically evaluating qualitative and quantitative research methods, including design, sampling, data-collection strategies, measurement and interpretation of results. All of these skills allow students to evaluate and critique findings to enhance evidence-based nursing practice, including dissemination of findings. Ethical issues are also addressed throughout the course.

Share your thoughts on HIPAA with the class. Do you feel that HIPAA really protects the patient? How do you think patients feel about HIPAA? Do you think that they believe it is an inconvenience or a worthwhile law?

Share your thoughts on HIPAA with the class. Do you feel that HIPAA really protects the patient? How do you think patients feel about HIPAA? Do you think that they believe it is an inconvenience or a worthwhile law?

Consider what you currently know about this topic. What additional information would you need to answer the question?

Assignment: Application:
Using the Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum

Have you ever gone online to search for a journal article on a specific topic? It is amazing to see the large number of journals that are available in the health care field. When you view the library in its entirety, you are viewing untapped data. Until you actually research for your particular topic, there is little structure. Once you have narrowed it down, you have information and once you apply the information, you have knowledge. Eventually, after thoughtful research and diligent practice, you reach the level of wisdom—knowledge applied in meaningful ways.

Are there areas in your practice that you believe should be more fully explored? The central aims of nursing informatics are to manage and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. This continuum represents the overarching structure of nursing informatics. In this Assignment, you develop a research question relevant to your practice area and relate how you would work through the progression from data to information, knowledge, and wisdom.

To prepare:

  • Review the information in Figure 6–2 in Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge.

 

 

 

 

  • Develop a clinical question related to your area of practice that you would like to explore.

  What is the sepsis core measures 2016?

 

 

  • Consider what you currently know about this topic. What additional information would you need to answer the question?
  • Using the continuum of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom, determine how you would go about researching your question.
    • Explore the available databases in the Walden Library. Identify which of these databases you would use to find the information or data you need.
    • Once you have identified useful databases, how would you go about finding the most relevant articles and information?
    • Consider how you would extract the relevant information from the articles.
    • How would you take the information and organize it in a way that was useful? How could you take the step from simply having useful knowledge to gaining wisdom?
By Day 7 of Week 4

Write a 4-page paper that addresses the following:

  • Summarize the question you developed, and then relate how you would work through the four steps of the data, information, knowledge, wisdom continuum. Be specific.
    • Identify the databases and search words you would use.
    • Relate how you would take the information gleaned and turn it into useable knowledge.
  • Can informatics be used to gain wisdom? Describe how you would progress from simply having useful knowledge to the wisdom to make decisions about the information you have found during your database search.

Your paper must also include a title page, an introduction, a summary, and a reference page.

RUBRIC – Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers

 

  Levels of Achievement
Criteria Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED –
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points)
30 to 30 points

Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics

25 to 29 points

Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics

20 to 24 points

Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

16 to 19 points

Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

0 to 15 points

Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to 5 points

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to 4 points

Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

1 to 3 points

Purpose of the assignment is vague.

0 to 0 points

No purpose statement was provided.

ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts (0-10 Points)
10 to 10 points

Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

9 to 9 points

Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

8 to 8 points

Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

5 to 7 points

Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

0 to 4 points

Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

 

ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points) 20 to 20 points

Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.

15 to 19 points

Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.

10 to 14 points

Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view.

3 to 9 points

Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

0 to 2 points

Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.

ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points) 20 to 20 points

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

18 to 19 points

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

16 to 17 points

Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

14 to 15 points

Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

0 to 13 points

Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 1. Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards.

5 to 5 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards.

4 to 4 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 80% of the time.

3 to 3 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 70% of the time.

0 to 2 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards < 70% of the time.

 

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 2. English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

5 to 5 points

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to 4 points

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to 3 points

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3

0 to 2 points

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 3. The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

5 to 5 points

Uses correct APA format wit

Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective.

Application: Part 1 – Developing a Health Advocacy Campaign

To complete:

For the Part 1 application (approximately 4 pages of content with a title page and references in APA format) address the following:

  • Describe your selected population health issue and the population affected by this issue.

                                 health issue: Obesity 

                                 population affected: Hispanic Americans

 

  • Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area.
  • Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective.
  • Begin to develop a plan for a health advocacy campaign that seeks to create a new policy or change an existing policy with regard to the issue and population you selected. Be sure to include in your plan:

A description of the public health issue and proposed policy solution

  • Specific objectives for the policy you want to be implemented
  • Begin to substantiate of your proposed campaign by data and evidence.

 

 

Rubric-Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers

 

  Levels of Achievement
Criteria Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED –
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking (0-30 Points)
30 to 30 points

Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics

25 to 29 points

Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics

20 to 24 points

Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

16 to 19 points

Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

0 to 15 points

Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to 5 points

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to 4 points

Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

1 to 3 points

Purpose of the assignment is vague.

0 to 0 points

No purpose statement was provided.

ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts (0-10 Points)
10 to 10 points

Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

9 to 9 points

Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

8 to 8 points

Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

5 to 7 points

Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

0 to 4 points

Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

 

ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources (0-20 Points) 20 to 20 points

Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.

15 to 19 points

Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3-4 course resources to support point of view.

10 to 14 points

Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3 to 4 course resources to support major points and point of view.

3 to 9 points

Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

0 to 2 points

Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.

ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 3. Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. (0-20 Points) 20 to 20 points

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

18 to 19 points

Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

16 to 17 points

Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

14 to 15 points

Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

0 to 13 points

Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 1. Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards.

5 to 5 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards.

4 to 4 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 80% of the time.

3 to 3 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards 70% of the time.

0 to 2 points

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards < 70% of the time.

 

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 2. English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

5 to 5 points

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to 4 points

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to 3 points

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3

0 to 2 points

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

WRITTEN EXPRESSION AND FORMATTING 3. The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list (0-5 Points) 5 to 5 points

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

5 to 5 points

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to 4 points

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to 3 points

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 to 2 points

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.