PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:
1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM
2). ATLEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS
3). PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING ATTACHED RUBRIC DETAILS.
Thank you.
When you decide to purchase a new car, you first decide what is important to you. If mileage and dependability are the important factors, you will search for data focused more on these factors and less on color options and sound systems.
The same holds true when searching for research evidence to guide your clinical inquiry and professional decisions. Developing a formula for an answerable, researchable question that addresses your need will make the search process much more effective. One such formula is the PICO(T) format.
In this Discussion, you will transform a clinical inquiry into a searchable question in PICO(T) format, so you can search the electronic databases more effectively and efficiently. You will share this PICO(T) question and examine strategies you might use to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question.
To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
• Review the materials offering guidance on using databases, performing keyword searches, and developing PICO(T) questions provided in the Resources.
• Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least two different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
• Review the Resources for guidance and develop a PICO(T) question of interest to you for further study. It is suggested that an Intervention-type PICOT question be developed as these seem to work best for this course.

Write a brief description of your clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question. Describe your search results in terms of the number of articles returned on original research and how this changed as you added search terms using your Boolean operators. Finally, explain strategies you might make to increase the rigor and effectiveness of a database search on your PICO(T) question. Be specific and provide examples.

Vaccine controversies are not recent in the medicinal field. For the past 80 years, numerous opposing issues regarding vaccines have appeared. Regardless of scientists’ several efforts to verify that vaccines are useful and safe for people, panic remained a vast blow to their continuous hard work. The panic arose because of numerous epidemics and demises from vaccine-preventable illnesses.
The vaccine controversies adhere to a particular sequence, making it tough to restructure the public’s trust in the vaccine. Primarily, a hypothesis concerning the negative health effect of a vaccine is established, restricting the initial research on the vaccine. Ultimately, the public’s assurance of the vaccine is conceded and may take years to recreate. This is an enormous health problem since it surges people’s vulnerability to the related illnesses along with significant fiscal losses in the vaccine businesses. For example, Doctor Andrew Wakefield’s disputed the contention that the MMR vaccine instigates autism; this resulted in many inconsistencies and deficits and was labeled as the most disparaging medical paradox for the past 100 years (Dixon & Clarke, 2013).
Even though vaccines are likely to cause various health effects, the effects are extremely rare and make it tough for experts to regulate their grounds. Nevertheless, for the immunization programs to be efficient, the public’s trust is vital. Numerous pieces of evidence have established that vaccines inhibitions have resulted in an ending of numerous sorrows and deaths triggered by infectious illnesses compared to the number of hostile effects it has produced. Consequently, comprehending the health risks caused by failing to vaccinate (Flaherty, 2011).
References
Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35(3), 358-382.
Flaherty, D. K. (2011). The vaccine-autism connection: a public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 45(10), 1302-1304.

For your final paper, you will need to write at least 2,000 words and use at least 8 sources on a topic of your choice, as long as the topic has to do with the medical field or nursing profession. We will go over some options in class, and I will help you brainstorm your topic. This essay must be argumentative, so you will need to take a stand on something or make an argument for or against an issue. We will be covering these different concepts in class. If you need a refresher, you will just need to rewatch the lecture videos related to this assignment. Email me with any questions.
Requirements:

• APA formatting
  • cover page
  • abstract
  • reference page with sources in APA formatting
  • Times New Roman, 12 point font
  • double-spacing
• at least 2,000 words
• at least 8 sources
• topic should be related to the medical field or nursing profession
• NO PLAGIARISM
• subject to late work policy