Social Science homework help

/in /by

When signing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the United States of America introduced, among others, the following two reservations:
“(2) That the United States reserves the right, subject to its Constitutional constraints, to impose capital punishment on any person (other than a pregnant woman) duly convicted under existing or future laws permitting the imposition of capital punishment, including such punishment for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age”.
“(3) That the United States considers itself bound by article 7 to the extent that `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ means the cruel and unusual treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States”.
The Kingdom of Spain advanced the following two objections to the named reservations:
“       … The Government of Spain takes the view that reservation (2) of the United States having regard to capital punishment for crimes committed by individuals under 18 years of age, in addition to reservation (3) having regard to article 7, constitute general derogations from articles 6 and 7, whereas, according to article 4, paragraph 2, of the Covenant, such derogations are not to be permitted.
Therefore, and bearing in mind that articles 6 and 7 protect two of the most fundamental rights embodied in the Covenant, the Government of Spain considers that these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant and, consequently, objects to them.
This position does not constitute an obstacle to the entry into force of the Covenant between the Kingdom of Spain and the United States of America”.
➢ Choose one of the two reservations introduced by the United States and its corresponding objection and answer:  Which of the two State-parties is right in this interpretative dispute?➢ Afford both legal and moral-political arguments in favor of your position, identify possible counter-arguments, and rebut them. ➢ Sustain your moral-political arguments and counter-arguments on the ideas of at least one author per each of the four political-legal traditions studied along this course: positivism, liberalism, Marxism and Critical Legal Studies; and the Natural Law tradition.   ➢ Maximum number of words: 2000.➢ Assessment criteria: (A) Sufficient, pertinent and accurate use of core concepts: 0,75; (B) sufficient and accurate citation of bibliographical resources: 0, 75; (c) overall depth and coherence of the argument: 0,5.

Social Science homework help

/in /by

When signing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the United States of America introduced, among others, the following two reservations:
“(2) That the United States reserves the right, subject to its Constitutional constraints, to impose capital punishment on any person (other than a pregnant woman) duly convicted under existing or future laws permitting the imposition of capital punishment, including such punishment for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age”.
“(3) That the United States considers itself bound by article 7 to the extent that `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ means the cruel and unusual treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States”.
The Kingdom of Spain advanced the following two objections to the named reservations:
“       … The Government of Spain takes the view that reservation (2) of the United States having regard to capital punishment for crimes committed by individuals under 18 years of age, in addition to reservation (3) having regard to article 7, constitute general derogations from articles 6 and 7, whereas, according to article 4, paragraph 2, of the Covenant, such derogations are not to be permitted.
Therefore, and bearing in mind that articles 6 and 7 protect two of the most fundamental rights embodied in the Covenant, the Government of Spain considers that these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant and, consequently, objects to them.
This position does not constitute an obstacle to the entry into force of the Covenant between the Kingdom of Spain and the United States of America”.
➢ Choose one of the two reservations introduced by the United States and its corresponding objection and answer:  Which of the two State-parties is right in this interpretative dispute?➢ Afford both legal and moral-political arguments in favor of your position, identify possible counter-arguments, and rebut them. ➢ Sustain your moral-political arguments and counter-arguments on the ideas of at least one author per each of the four political-legal traditions studied along this course: positivism, liberalism, Marxism and Critical Legal Studies; and the Natural Law tradition.   ➢ Maximum number of words: 2000.➢ Assessment criteria: (A) Sufficient, pertinent and accurate use of core concepts: 0,75; (B) sufficient and accurate citation of bibliographical resources: 0, 75; (c) overall depth and coherence of the argument: 0,5.

Social Science homework help

/in /by

When signing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the United States of America introduced, among others, the following two reservations:
“(2) That the United States reserves the right, subject to its Constitutional constraints, to impose capital punishment on any person (other than a pregnant woman) duly convicted under existing or future laws permitting the imposition of capital punishment, including such punishment for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age”.
“(3) That the United States considers itself bound by article 7 to the extent that `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ means the cruel and unusual treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States”.
The Kingdom of Spain advanced the following two objections to the named reservations:
“       … The Government of Spain takes the view that reservation (2) of the United States having regard to capital punishment for crimes committed by individuals under 18 years of age, in addition to reservation (3) having regard to article 7, constitute general derogations from articles 6 and 7, whereas, according to article 4, paragraph 2, of the Covenant, such derogations are not to be permitted.
Therefore, and bearing in mind that articles 6 and 7 protect two of the most fundamental rights embodied in the Covenant, the Government of Spain considers that these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant and, consequently, objects to them.
This position does not constitute an obstacle to the entry into force of the Covenant between the Kingdom of Spain and the United States of America”.
➢ Choose one of the two reservations introduced by the United States and its corresponding objection and answer:  Which of the two State-parties is right in this interpretative dispute?➢ Afford both legal and moral-political arguments in favor of your position, identify possible counter-arguments, and rebut them. ➢ Sustain your moral-political arguments and counter-arguments on the ideas of at least one author per each of the four political-legal traditions studied along this course: positivism, liberalism, Marxism and Critical Legal Studies; and the Natural Law tradition.   ➢ Maximum number of words: 2000.➢ Assessment criteria: (A) Sufficient, pertinent and accurate use of core concepts: 0,75; (B) sufficient and accurate citation of bibliographical resources: 0, 75; (c) overall depth and coherence of the argument: 0,5.

Social Science homework help

/in /by

When signing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the United States of America introduced, among others, the following two reservations:
“(2) That the United States reserves the right, subject to its Constitutional constraints, to impose capital punishment on any person (other than a pregnant woman) duly convicted under existing or future laws permitting the imposition of capital punishment, including such punishment for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age”.
“(3) That the United States considers itself bound by article 7 to the extent that `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ means the cruel and unusual treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States”.
The Kingdom of Spain advanced the following two objections to the named reservations:
“       … The Government of Spain takes the view that reservation (2) of the United States having regard to capital punishment for crimes committed by individuals under 18 years of age, in addition to reservation (3) having regard to article 7, constitute general derogations from articles 6 and 7, whereas, according to article 4, paragraph 2, of the Covenant, such derogations are not to be permitted.
Therefore, and bearing in mind that articles 6 and 7 protect two of the most fundamental rights embodied in the Covenant, the Government of Spain considers that these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant and, consequently, objects to them.
This position does not constitute an obstacle to the entry into force of the Covenant between the Kingdom of Spain and the United States of America”.
➢ Choose one of the two reservations introduced by the United States and its corresponding objection and answer:  Which of the two State-parties is right in this interpretative dispute?➢ Afford both legal and moral-political arguments in favor of your position, identify possible counter-arguments, and rebut them. ➢ Sustain your moral-political arguments and counter-arguments on the ideas of at least one author per each of the four political-legal traditions studied along this course: positivism, liberalism, Marxism and Critical Legal Studies; and the Natural Law tradition.   ➢ Maximum number of words: 2000.➢ Assessment criteria: (A) Sufficient, pertinent and accurate use of core concepts: 0,75; (B) sufficient and accurate citation of bibliographical resources: 0, 75; (c) overall depth and coherence of the argument: 0,5.

Sociology homework help

/in /by

11/26/2020 Topic: Several extra credit opportunities: what did you notice and learn?
https://ccs.instructure.com/courses/1961380/discussion_topics/11340606 1/1
Replies are only visible to those who have posted at least one reply.

This is a graded discussion: 100 points possible
due Nov 30
Several extra credit opportunities: what did you notice and learn?
Search entries or author
 Reply
Dear students,
Here I have several extra credit opportunity for you to choose. Choose ONE of them to reply,
you earn extra credit.
(1) Have you watched “Asian American” Documentary yet? It was shown on May 11 and 12, 5
hours in total 5 episodes. If you have not, you still have a chance to watch it here in this link!
https://www.pbs.org/weta/asian-americans/ (https://www.pbs.org/weta/asian-americans/)
If you watch this film for any three episodes, write a report, then you can earn an extra credit!
Your writing should be within 200-300 words. Well written with what you takeaway, what is the
relevant concept or theories you see from the film to this course.
Enjoy this film, it is a great production, I learned a lot from the film.
(2) Can you compare two Presidential Candidate’s (Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden) view and policy
on environment protection, climate change? Do a research on your own, check websites,
articles, site the source of your information. For how to site the source of information in an
academic manner, check out library workshops. By clicking SFCC library tab on the left side of
the screen.
(3) Compare how two Presidential Candidate’s (Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden) view and policy on
race relations and racism? Listen to Presidential candidate forums; Do a research on your
own, check websites, articles, site the source of your information. For how to site the source of
information in an academic manner, check out library workshops. By clicking SFCC library tab
on the left side of the screen.
Unread  

Human Resource Management homework help

/in /by

Knowledge management is the process of moving from understanding information to using information to improve business processes and ensure long-term sustainability. Two popular strategies associated with knowledge management are the push strategy (active management of knowledge) and the pull strategy (making knowledge requests of experts).
Research the push and pull strategies associated with knowledge management and provide the following in a 3- to 5-page paper:

  • ****Overview of push and pull strategies in the context of knowledge management
  • ****Advantages and disadvantages of push and pull strategies in the context of knowledge management
  • *****Recommendation of either push or pull strategy in healthcare organizations for knowledge management

To support your work, use your course and textbook readings as well as the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.
All questions are to be answered in detail with examples.

Human Resource Management homework help

/in /by
Human Resource Management homework help. Image matters, and organizations must pay attention to their brand. Not having any visibility is as unfortunate as a negative public image. Positive branding and such items as logos and company prestige often means a bigger market share and respect and appreciation from the community.

  • Consider organizational brands that you view as positive and others you view as negative. What do the positive companies have in common, and what do the negative companies have in common in your opinion?
  • If you were an HR pro with a company that had a neutral reputation, what might you do to improve it?

Social Science homework help

/in /by
When signing the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the United States of America introduced, among others, the following two reservations:
“(2) That the United States reserves the right, subject to its Constitutional constraints, to impose capital punishment on any person (other than a pregnant woman) duly convicted under existing or future laws permitting the imposition of capital punishment, including such punishment for crimes committed by persons below eighteen years of age”.
“(3) That the United States considers itself bound by article 7 to the extent that `cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ means the cruel and unusual treatment or punishment prohibited by the Fifth, Eighth, and/or Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States”.
The Kingdom of Spain advanced the following two objections to the named reservations:
“       … The Government of Spain takes the view that reservation (2) of the United States having regard to capital punishment for crimes committed by individuals under 18 years of age, in addition to reservation (3) having regard to article 7, constitute general derogations from articles 6 and 7, whereas, according to article 4, paragraph 2, of the Covenant, such derogations are not to be permitted.
Therefore, and bearing in mind that articles 6 and 7 protect two of the most fundamental rights embodied in the Covenant, the Government of Spain considers that these reservations are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Covenant and, consequently, objects to them.
This position does not constitute an obstacle to the entry into force of the Covenant between the Kingdom of Spain and the United States of America”.
➢ Choose one of the two reservations introduced by the United States and its corresponding objection and answer:  Which of the two State-parties is right in this interpretative dispute?➢ Afford both legal and moral-political arguments in favor of your position, identify possible counter-arguments, and rebut them. ➢ Sustain your moral-political arguments and counter-arguments on the ideas of at least one author per each of the four political-legal traditions studied along this course: positivism, liberalism, Marxism and Critical Legal Studies; and the Natural Law tradition.   ➢ Maximum number of words: 2000.➢ Assessment criteria: (A) Sufficient, pertinent and accurate use of core concepts: 0,75; (B) sufficient and accurate citation of bibliographical resources: 0, 75; (c) overall depth and coherence of the argument: 0,5.

Social Science homework help

/in /by
MDP 500 – FOUNDATIONS OF DEVELOPMENT: THEORIES AND HISTORY FINAL PAPER
In an essay of approximately 3,000 words, address the following prompt:
· In this essay, it is your task to explore how capitalism has shifted over time, altering the relative importance of different forms of capital (industrial, merchant, speculative, usury, dispossession, etc.), and changing the distribution of wealth and poverty. In this essay, we ask you to explore these shifts by addressing the following questions: How has capitalism reinvented itself in varied forms over the course of the past century? What have been the effects of these changes on the distribution of wealth and poverty? How have these changes shifted approaches to development?

  • Your analysis should be grounded throughout with specific      examples (from case studies, readings, class discussion, using the      following text books:
  • McMichael, Philip. 2012. Development and Social Change. A Global Perspective. 5th Edition. Los Angeles: Sage
  • Hickel, Jason. 2017. The Divide: Global Inequality from      Conquest to Free Markets. New York: W.W. Norton., etc).

You will be graded on the clarity of your argument(s) and organization, grounding in specific examples, the professionalism of writing, and proper use of citations (Chicago 16th, Author-Date). Keep in mind that this paper must include a thesis statement and argument (it is not a book report). Your paper must be double-spaced, size 12 font, Times New Roman, 1” margins.
Papers are due by 11:59 pm, November 27, 2020.
Papers should be submitted as a word document to the Final Paper Assignment.

  • attachment

    3000words.docx