Review the Key Lessons from Chapter 1 ( The “Ravell” Corporation ) from the attached book. Explain the five key lessons and note the importance of each key lesson from chapter 1. Also, note why is it important to understand these basic concepts.

Write a 2-page paper.

Answer in proper APA format including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced with proper references and in-text citations.

One of the references should include the attached book.

Include an APA cover page and include at least two APA formatted references (and APA in-text citations) to support the work.

Make sure no Plagiarism!

Thefinal assignment is to write a three- to five- page paperthat addresses how the topic of recreational marijuana illustrates these themes. The point of this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of the issues associated with the topic and their relationship to State and local politics.

English 1101
Annotated Bibliography
Dr. Brumfield
For this final assignment, you will research a topic of interest to you, formulate a thesis statement, and then create
an annotated bibliography from your research. YOU ARE NOT WRITING A RESEARCH PAPER! The purpose of your
work is twofold:
(1) to provide general background information about your selected topic, and
(2) to summarize arguments for and against your topic.
Your annotated bibliography will contain the following for each entry: one direct quotation and one overall
summary; your bibliography must contain a minimum of 7 separate sources of the following types and quantities:
• (1) Book (Can come from GALILEO)
• (3) Journal Articles (MUST COME FROM GALILEO)
• (1) Magazine or newspaper articles (not scholarly) (Should come from GALILEO)
• (2) Websites / videos / other types of media (reputable only) / field research (interview, observation,
survey)
An annotated bibliography is a list of citations of books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a
brief (AT LEAST 100 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph called the annotation. The purpose of the
annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited. Your annotation will
also contain one meaningful direct quotation for each source. You are not writing abstracts, which are purely
descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in periodical indexes. Rather,
you are writing annotations, which are both descriptive and critical; they describe the author’s point of view,
authority, and/or clarity and appropriateness of expression.
Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition,
succinct analysis, and informed library research. First, locate and record citations to books, periodicals, and
documents that may contain useful information and ideas on your topic. Briefly examine and review the actual
items. Then choose those works that provide a variety of perspectives on your topic (be sure to include entries that
not only support your claim but also refute it). Cite the book, article, or document following MLA guidelines.
Write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. Include one or
more sentences that (a) evaluate the authority or background of the author, (b) comment on the intended
audience, (c) compare or contrast this work with another you have cited, or (d) explain how this work illuminates
your bibliography topic. The annotation will also include one direct quotation (not included in the word count).
Your bibliography will contain an introduction that explains the scope of your investigation (your thesis) and
provides a rationale for your selection of sources; additionally, your bibliography will contain an evaluative
conclusion, in which you explain what you learned from the process.
Your annotated bibliography will be comprised of the following components:
(1) A title
(2) An introduction
(3) At least 7 annotated bibliographical entries arranged alphabetically by TYPE (i.e., all articles together)
(4) An evaluative conclusion
Your annotated bibliography will be formatted as follows:
(1) MLA 2016 update for citations and document format
(2) Double spaced throughout
(3) 12 point, times new roman
(4) Each entry will be formatted like the sample above (hanging indent for the entire entry).
Following is a sample entry. You’ll have at least 7 entries in your bibliography.
Tompkins, Jane. “Indians: Textualism, Morality, and the Problem of History.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 13 no. 1, 1986,
pp. 101 – 19. EBSCOHost, doi: 10255487/hr104-2017-174.
ANNOTATION: Tompkins explores her attempts to uncover the truth about historical encounters between
Native Americans and European colonists through a personal narrative. Documenting her research processes
chronologically, Tompkins shows how her perspective changes as she consults historical documents written by first
the colonizers and then the colonized. Tompkins ultimately concludes that since no overarching historical narrative
exists, students of history must seek out competing versions of history to approximate the truth. This article
represents an important contribution to the field of historiography and supports my thesis. QUOTE: “The American
Indian suffered one of the most brutal expulsions of any people in history” (117).
Some useful language for talking about texts and arguments:
It is sometimes challenging to find the vocabulary in which to summarize and discuss a text. Here is a list of some
verbs for referring to texts and ideas that you might find useful:
account for clarify describe exemplify indicate question
analyze compare depict exhibit investigate recognize
argue conclude determine explain judge reflect
assess criticize distinguish frame justify refer to
assert defend evaluate identify narrate report
assume define emphasize illustrate persuade review
claim demonstrate examine imply propose suggest
The evidence indicates that . . . The article assesses the effect of . . .
The author identifies three reasons for . . . The article questions the view thak

You will write a 2,000–word paper that analyzes the images attached below.

The paper must use APA format, 12–point Times New Roman typeface ,one–inch margins (top, bottom, right, left) and be double–spaced. IMPORTANT:The 2,000–word minimum does not include title page, references,appendices, etc. It only counts on the body of the paper!

You must have a minimum of 5 sources. Sources CANNOT,under any circumstances,be from anyonline encyclopedia, Wikipedia, or online dictionary! Sources should be academic books, academic journals, or reliable online sources (blogs and personal websites are not reliable sources).

Divide your paper into nine sections: an introduction, the six perspectives, a conclusion, and a reference sectionwith at least five sources. Use boldface headings for each section.

Introduction(≈5% of paper, first and second person pronouns are allowed)This first paragraph introduces the reader to the image you chose and that you will analyze it with the six perspectives. In addition, it introduces/outlines the paper as a whole (similar to an introduction you would write for an essay).

Personal Perspective(≈10% of paper, first and second person pronouns are allowed)Say why you chose the image and analyze it using your personal opinions. Write about your initial“gut” reactions to the image.

Historical Perspective(≈10% of paper, first and second person pronouns NOTallowed)Analyze the image by placing it in its historical context.

Technical Perspective(≈20% of paper, first and second person pronouns NOTallowed)Discussthe image by describing how it was madeand a minimum of three (3) aesthetic or theoretical elements discussed in the course(e.g., line, shape, color, composition, Gestalt theories, rule of thirds, 3–D depth cues). You must identify “what” elements you are discussing, but also “how” and “why” it connects to the image.

Ethical Perspective(≈20% of paper, first and second person pronouns NOTallowed)Justify the image by using one of the six philosophies.If you can’t find a philosophy to justify it, then make an ethical argument against the image using one of the six philosophies. First and second person pronouns are notallowed.

Cultural Perspective(≈20% of paper, first and second person pronouns NOTallowed)Identify and explain as many symbols as you can.First and second person personal are notallowed.

Critical Perspective(≈10% of paper, first and second person pronouns areallowed)Write a more reasoned personal perspective.How has your view of the image changed after you’ve spent time with it and researched all the other perspective? Maybe it hasn’t changed and you can write about that. Personal pronouns are allowed.

Conclusion(≈5% of paper, first and second person pronouns are allowed)Your conclusion should state what you learned from this assignment.

References You need at least 5sources.Use MUST use in–text citations for any information you use from sources.Points are deducted if you list a sourcein the References section, but there are no in–text citations referring to it.

Please see attached for the images and essay template.