Civil homework help

question in docx. form
please use only the readings I provided on arguments mentioned in the prompt
A good essay will begin with a thesis that clearly summarizes your analysis of the proposition. You may agree, disagree, or agree in part and disagree in part with the proposition. Use the materials that the question requires plus other material that we have studied this semester to support your thesis. You are limited to 900 words per essay.
 
Proposition: The courts should return to the pre-1922 Constitutional understanding, and allow legislatures to limit development of land without inquiring into whether a regulatory taking has occurred.
 
Analyze this proposition using the examples from the Humboldt County controversy and at least one of three court cases: Just, Lucas or Kelo. Also discuss the ideas of at least two of the following writers: John Stuart Mill, Henry George, David Hume, William Blackstone, Ronald Coase, Elinor Ostrom.
 

4. Charles Reich argued that the mid-20th century expansion of government largess threatened to undermine the protections of liberty that the Bill of Rights embodies. He argued that accepting direct governmental aid, such as welfare, social security or unemployment payments, should not give the government the power to intrude upon a citizen’s liberty. However, Reich did not face the problem of chronic homelessness that confronts many urban areas in the 21st century. The appropriate remedy for chronic homelessness is to provide supportive shelters for the homeless where the government can require the homeless live in exchange for receiving government aid. In these supportive shelters, the former homeless should be required to follow the rules developed for their own good, even if these rules impinge on their constitutional rights. Such rules could include taking prescribed medicines for mental conditions, attending classes to help transition them to gainful employment, and participating in treatment for problems with addiction.