This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Problem
|
10
to >8.0 pts
Accomplished
Clinical problem is discussed with citations. Gap in the research literature is identified and described.
|
8
to >3.0 pts
Competent
Significance of problem vague. Gap in the research literature is not well described.
No citation given.
|
3
to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Problem or gap is not discussed.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Article # 1
Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points
per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria
outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
|
20
to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses
the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements
presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1
point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and
demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed
and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the
variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements
are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is
included.
There are 20 points allotted for each article.
|
16
to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
|
6
to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Article # 2
Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points
per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria
outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
|
20
to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses
the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements
presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1
point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and
demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed
and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the
variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements
are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is
included.
There are 20 points allotted for each article.
|
16
to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
|
6
to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Article # 3
Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points
per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria
outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
|
20
to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses
the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements
presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1
point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and
demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed
and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the
variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements
are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is
included.
There are 20 points allotted for each article.
|
16
to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
|
6
to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Article # 4
Appraisal If the article is not included in the submission, 5 points
per article will be deducted. If the study does not meet criteria
outlined in the assignment instructions, 20 points will be deducted.
|
20
to >16.0 pts
Accomplished
Uses
the PINCH Table to identify current studies and describe the elements
presented in the study. Elements for each article include: author (1
point), study purpose (3 points), sample description including size and
demographics (4 points), study design type (3 points), variables listed
and identified by type (DV and or IV) (4 points), measurements of the
variables (3 points), major study findings/results (2 points). Elements
are described fully and any important notes are included. Article is
included.
There are 20 points allotted for each article.
|
16
to >6.0 pts
Competent
Vague explanation of elements given. Missing article.
|
6
to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Study does not met the criteria for the assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Formatting and APA Style
|
10
to >8.0 pts
Accomplished
PinchTable used for assignment. Pinch Table organized and readable. Spelling counts.
Reference page included with no citation errors.
|
8
to >3.0 pts
Competent
Pinch Table disorganized with errors. -1 point off for each error on formatting and basic readability.
|
3
to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
More than 7 errors
|
|
10 pts
|
Total Points:
100
|