Health Medical Homework Help

Grand Canyon University Media Outlets Discussion

 

please respond to the following discussion post as a peer commenting on the post. Today, media outlets are a major source of how we are informed and updated with current events. However, media outlets are not always reliable and are notorious for spreading false information. Media outlets often alter headlines and article content to attract more attention from viewers. Therefore, it is important to understand how to decipher if an online source is credible or not. This can be done by evaluating the authorship, publisher, dates, and footnotes/bibliographies of the source (Ross-Hellauer, 2017).

The main differences between peer-reviewed research and media outlets are that peer-reviewed articles, or scholarly articles, are published by authors who are knowledgeable or experts on the specific subject and it is then reviewed to be approved by the board of professional experts in the discipline relating to the specific article topic. These peer-reviewed articles are more likely to be scientifically valid and reach reasonable conclusions (Dijkstra et al., 2018). Statistical knowledge from peer-reviewed research can help you use the proper methods to collect the data, employ the correct analyses, and effectively present the results. It is a crucial process behind how we make discoveries in science, make decisions based on data, and make predictions. Lastly, the content of the peer-reviewed article refers to a specific audience that can reflect on one’s age or education level (Texas Tech, 2021).

In contrast, media outlets often write for a general audience, so they use jargon that is easy to understand and is quick to read. These types of articles are typically written by authors who do not have to be an expert or knowledgeable of the article topic and their articles are not approved or reviewed by subject specialists. These articles also don’t include a specific format/structure or a bibliography or footnotes (Texas Tech, 2021).

References:

Dijkstra, S., Kok, G., Ledford, J. G., Sandalova, E., & Stevelink, R. (2018). Possibilities and Pitfalls of Social Media for Translational Medicine. Frontiers in Medicine, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2018.00345

Ross-Hellauer T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2

Texas Tech University System. (2021). How to recognize peer-reviewed journals. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from https://www.angelo.edu/library/handouts/peerrev.php