Humanities Homework Help

York St John University Social Psychology Discussion

 

part 1: covering chapters 5, 7, and 8 (pick 2 out of the 3 to read and write your paper on) from the “Revisiting the Classic Studies” book. text “Social Psychology: Revisiting the Classics, 2nd edition”. This paper needs to be a minimum of 3 double spaced, times new roman 12 point font with 1 inch margins (title page and references do not count toward page length totals). For this paper, you will need to address the following 1) Discuss what you found most interesting in each of the chapters you read from “Social Psychology: Revisiting the Classics.” 2) How do you feel these chapters relate to one or more theories we have discussed in the course, and why? Each chapter may have its own theory you discuss, or one that connects both chapters (with explanation of “why” for each) 3) Which chapter/experiment do you feel has had a bigger impact on the field of social psychology OR our society as a whole? Explain why you feel this way. 4) What issues/concerns/ criticism did you have with the ideas presented in that chapters (ex: poor study design for one or both? Why? Not generalizable to the full population? Why? Borderline unethical? Why? etc) or, how do you feel you could extend the study idea into a new domain (Example; does the Milgram study change how you feel about a theory from child psych – how so?). 5) In your opinion, can individuals avoid or overcome unwanted persuasions? How? If you were asked to design a training seminar to teach individuals how to avoid unwanted persuasion, what details would you take into consideration and why? Part 2:covering chapters 9, 11, 12, and 15 from the “classics” text. “Social Psychology: Revisiting the Classics, 2nd edition”. This paper needs to be a minimum of 3 pages, double spaced, times new roman 12 point font with 1 inch margins (title page and references do not count toward page length totals). For this paper, you will need to address the following 1) Discuss what you found most interesting in each of the chapters you read from “Social Psychology: Revisiting the Classics.” 2) How do you feel these chapters relate to one or more theories we have discussed in the course, and why? Each chapter may have its own theory you discuss, or one that connects both chapters (with explanation of “why” for each) 3) Which chapter/experiment do you feel has had a bigger impact on the field of social psychology OR our society as a whole? Explain why you feel this way. 4) What issues/concerns/ criticism did you have with the ideas presented in that chapters (ex: poor study design for one or both? Why? Not generalizable to the full population? Why? Borderline unethical? Why? etc) or, how do you feel you could extend the study idea into a new domain (Example; does the Milgram study change how you feel about a theory from child psych – how so?). 5) In your opinion, can individuals avoid or overcome unwanted persuasions? How? If you were asked to design a training seminar to teach individuals how to avoid unwanted persuasion, what details would you take into consideration and why?