Law Homework Help

Worth 30% of the final grade

For insights into legal advocacy, courtroom conduct, judicial decision-making, as well as an area of substantive law, students will analyze a hearing at the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) of an appeal of a Manitoba case or a case from the textbook, and read the judgment.

This is an online project restricted to 1) the SCC webcast; and 2) the final judgment.

Finding an SCC hearing

Choose any 1 case of interest from this list of Manitoba cases:

1. Cases appealed from Manitoba:
2. 1.) K.G.K. 2019-09-25 (2:36:05; starts at 4:11) – constitutional law re delay
3. 2.) Friesen 2019-10-16 (2:45:59) – criminal law
4. 3.) J.W. 2018-10-10 (2:28:22) – Indigenous law/civil procedure
5. 4.) Green 2016-11-09 (2:11:32) – law of professions
6. 5.) Daniels 2015-10-08 (3:32:38) – Indigenous law/constitutional law

6.)Stuart Olson Dominion Construction 2015-01-19 (2:22:51) – liens law

7.)MMF 2011-12-13 (3:05:35) – Indigenous law

8.)Schreyer 2010-11-09 (2:24:56) – family law

-Google search “Supreme Court of Canada,” click “Cases,” and then “Archived Webcasts;”

-Click the arrows to the year and month of your chosen case, click “Search,” and scroll down to the chosen case title; and

-Under “Webcast,” click “Archived” and start the webcast.

-The Court will likely not give its full judgment during the webcast so you must find and read it. -You can simply Google “Supreme Court of Canada (case name)”

What must be addressed

Succinctly address these matters:

1. a summary of the key facts, and the legal principles in dispute, including the outcomes in the lower courts;

2. observations and impressions of the hearing, noting procedures, and the methods, skills, and demeanor of the lawyers and justices;

3. the judgment and reasoning, including dissenting opinion; and

4. impressions about judicial decision-making.

PLEASE MAKE IT PLAGIARISM FREE AND NO GRAMMER MISTAKES AND BE VERY CLEAR IN EASSY NO HARD VOCABULARY