Science Homework Help
SIM PATH 422 ASU Evaluating a Quantitative Research Design Essay
Activity 1
Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study
Read: Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice.
- Study 3 – Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
- Study 4 – Striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fracture
Suggested Reading
- Schreiber, M. L. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. MEDSURG Nursing, 25(6), 425-428.
- Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
- Wakefield, A. (2014). Searching and critiquing the research literature. Nursing Standard, 28(39), 49-57. doi:10.7748/ns.28.39.49.e8867
- LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Qualitative Specific Resources
- LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice.(9th ed) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
- Chapter1
- Chapter 2
- Chapter 3
Additional Instructions:
- All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
- Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.
- Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.
- Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.
- Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.
Submission Options:
Choose One: |
Instructions: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paper |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video Presentation |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Graphs or other illustrations |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Poster |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements. Evidenced-Based Practice- Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of utilization in practice. research and its Course Competencies: 1) Examine the relationships among theory, practice, and research. 2) Interpret research findings using the elements of the research process. 3) Differentiate between ethical and legal precepts that guide research conduct and protect human subjects. 4) Integrate reliable evidence from multiple ways of knowing, to inform practice and make clinical judgments. 5) Evaluate data from relevant sources, including technology, to inform the delivery of care to culturally and ethnically diverse populations. 6) Collaborate with health team members to collect, interpret, synthesize and disseminate evidence to improve patient outcomes in complex health care environments. QSEN Competency: 3) Evidence-Based Practice BSN Essential III, IV, VII, IX
Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purpose Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates ethical issues in the study using the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purpose Evaluates credibility of research article using most of the components (Greater than 3/4) of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates the problem statement and research design using most of the components of the evaluation (greater than 3⁄4) in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purpose Evaluates credibility of research article using one-half of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates the problem statement and research design using one-half of the evaluation in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). Evaluates ethical issues in the study using 3/4 of the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2018). Evaluates the purpose Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation Does not address section or includes less than one-half of the evaluation Does not address section or
References Provides two or Provides two Provides one Provides no more references. references. references. references.
|