Social Science homework help
Modify the existed essay base on the rubric and the feedbacks provided.
Lang Gao
Professor Adam D. Moore
Info 498
November 23, 2020
Karl Marx Communist Critical
Karl Marx communist critique is based on the Communist Manifesto, which was political text aimed at the advancing and informing the readers about the communist theory. The theory was aimed at criticizing capitalism at the time, and promotion of communism while giving suggestions on how to make the society a communist society. This writing demonstrated the destructive nature of capitalism, and it solution was to replace it with socialism (Marx, Frederick, and John). The Communist Manifesto was based on explaining the goals of communism and explanation of the theories that were related to this claim. The main point of focus was that class struggles resulted from the exploitation of the low class by the higher class resulting in political developments. The argument was based on the period’s means of production, although this relationship stopped being compatible as time passed by. The class antagonism results in a revolution and a new class emerges which takes the ruling. This class struggle is explained through the lens of four sections to engage the readers through the issue. The first talks about the historical developments in the society under the bourgeois and proletarians, and explains the antagonism is stimulated by existence of social classes. The second argument is about banning private property ownership and makes means of production to be owned by the community. The third argument posits the difference between socialist and communist. Finally, the author argues regarding the relationship between the bourgeois and the proletariat.
The first argument is true because it is based on exploration of the historical development of the society and the role played by the struggles instigated by bourgeois and proletarians. The oppression of the working class by the owners’ results in a revolution inspired by the knowledge that the working class is being oppressed and resort to class struggles. The struggles results from the fact that the bourgeois are overworking the proletariats in order to extend their capital ownership and increase profits (Marx, Frederick, and John). After realization of the exploitation the worker revolt as a way of liberating themselves.
The second argument is based on the relationship between the communists and the proletarians, which expounds on what they are looking for in a society. The point that the author wanted to explain is that the bourgeois blame the proletariats for the elimination of the private property. This is trying to make production means to be a community thing, and whatever will be mentioned will be from a community perspective and to represent the common interests of the people (Marx, Frederick, and John). However, the process of achieving political power by the working class is not easy and they need to follow certain guidelines for them to acquire the power. This involves taking property from the capital owners and promoting free education and eliminates class differences totally.
The third argument presented by the authors is aimed at drawing a line between socialism and communism. This made a clarification on the uniqueness of the communist system compared to other systems since it did not fail to recognize the potential reactionary capabilities. This was based on criticizing the capitalist system and calling for its elimination (Marx, Frederick, and John). This was based on the believe that any reforms that were inspired by the capitalists would fail, and this was the reason why there was need to make the workers more united.
Finally, Marx tends to explain the position of communism in the midst of the various opposing forces. The author focuses on evaluating conflicts on various countries on what they believe to be bourgeois revolution. Marx demonstrates to be fed up by the ruling demonstrated by the bourgeois that is the reason he calls for political alliances to team up and overthrow bourgeois governance by force (Marx, Frederick, and John). This was the Marx believe that communism revolution would help end capitalism.
However, Marx’s argument regarding the overthrow of the bourgeois through elimination of the private property ownership through the communism among the proletariats. However, I believe that this not the right approach because the capitalist have the power and any attempts by the lower workers proves futile due to dominance of the powers by the bourgeois. Any attempt to overthrow the capital owners will turn to be chaotic and the revolutionists may be forced to set their aside for them to live harmoniously. Besides, it is not easy for all the factors of production to be owned by a society. It is known that the society lacks the social order to guide their operations and there is no society without opposition (Rong). Besides, some social factors are provided on demand and supply basis to enhance quality, which can be compromised due to lack of concern in a communist setting.
In conclusion, the communist proposition that development is inevitable is true. Due to the instability observed in the capitalist system, change was inevitable. The communist was what was needed to eliminate class antagonism and could only be achieved through a revolution. The Communist Manifesto was based on how the proletariats would team up to remove bourgeois from power and end the oppression they faced. However, the author was wrong in that not all capital can be transferred to community ownership as this would compromise quality, which affects people’s welfare.
Work Cited
Marx, Karl, Frederick Engels, and John E. Toews. The Communist manifesto: With related documents. Macmillan Higher Education, 2017.
Rong, Zhaozi. “Productivity, public capital, and socialism with Chinese characteristics–A critique of the doctrine of incompatibility between capital and public ownership.” China Political Economy (2020).
Lang Gao
Professor Adam D. Moore
Info 498
November 23, 2020
Karl Marx Communist Critical
Karl Marx communist critique is based on the Communist Manifesto, which was political text aimed at the advancing and informing the readers about the communist theory. The theory was aimed at criticizing capitalism at the time, and promotion of communism while giving suggestions on how to make the society a communist society. This writing demonstrated the destructive nature of capitalism, and it solution was to replace it with socialism (Marx, Frederick, and John). The Communist Manifesto was based on explaining the goals of communism and explanation of the theories that were related to this claim. The main point of focus was that class struggles resulted from the exploitation of the low class by the higher class resulting in political developments. The argument was based on the period’s means of production, although this relationship stopped being compatible as time passed by. The class antagonism results in a revolution and a new class emerges which takes the ruling. This class struggle is explained through the lens of four sections to engage the readers through the issue. The first talks about the historical developments in the society under the bourgeois and proletarians, and explains the antagonism is stimulated by existence of social classes. The second argument is about banning private property ownership and makes means of production to be owned by the community. The third argument posits the difference between socialist and communist. Finally, the author argues regarding the relationship between the bourgeois and the proletariat.
The first argument is true because it is based on exploration of the historical development of the society and the role played by the struggles instigated by bourgeois and proletarians. The oppression of the working class by the owners’ results in a revolution inspired by the knowledge that the working class is being oppressed and resort to class struggles. The struggles results from the fact that the bourgeois are overworking the proletariats in order to extend their capital ownership and increase profits (Marx, Frederick, and John). After realization of the exploitation the worker revolt as a way of liberating themselves.
The second argument is based on the relationship between the communists and the proletarians, which expounds on what they are looking for in a society. The point that the author wanted to explain is that the bourgeois blame the proletariats for the elimination of the private property. This is trying to make production means to be a community thing, and whatever will be mentioned will be from a community perspective and to represent the common interests of the people (Marx, Frederick, and John). However, the process of achieving political power by the working class is not easy and they need to follow certain guidelines for them to acquire the power. This involves taking property from the capital owners and promoting free education and eliminates class differences totally.
The third argument presented by the authors is aimed at drawing a line between socialism and communism. This made a clarification on the uniqueness of the communist system compared to other systems since it did not fail to recognize the potential reactionary capabilities. This was based on criticizing the capitalist system and calling for its elimination (Marx, Frederick, and John). This was based on the believe that any reforms that were inspired by the capitalists would fail, and this was the reason why there was need to make the workers more united.
Finally, Marx tends to explain the position of communism in the midst of the various opposing forces. The author focuses on evaluating conflicts on various countries on what they believe to be bourgeois revolution. Marx demonstrates to be fed up by the ruling demonstrated by the bourgeois that is the reason he calls for political alliances to team up and overthrow bourgeois governance by force (Marx, Frederick, and John). This was the Marx believe that communism revolution would help end capitalism.
However, Marx’s argument regarding the overthrow of the bourgeois through elimination of the private property ownership through the communism among the proletariats. However, I believe that this not the right approach because the capitalist have the power and any attempts by the lower workers proves futile due to dominance of the powers by the bourgeois. Any attempt to overthrow the capital owners will turn to be chaotic and the revolutionists may be forced to set their aside for them to live harmoniously. Besides, it is not easy for all the factors of production to be owned by a society. It is known that the society lacks the social order to guide their operations and there is no society without opposition (Rong). Besides, some social factors are provided on demand and supply basis to enhance quality, which can be compromised due to lack of concern in a communist setting.
In conclusion, the communist proposition that development is inevitable is true. Due to the instability observed in the capitalist system, change was inevitable. The communist was what was needed to eliminate class antagonism and could only be achieved through a revolution. The Communist Manifesto was based on how the proletariats would team up to remove bourgeois from power and end the oppression they faced. However, the author was wrong in that not all capital can be transferred to community ownership as this would compromise quality, which affects people’s welfare.
Work Cited
Marx, Karl, Frederick Engels, and John E. Toews. The Communist manifesto: With related documents. Macmillan Higher Education, 2017.
Rong, Zhaozi. “Productivity, public capital, and socialism with Chinese characteristics–A critique of the doctrine of incompatibility between capital and public ownership.” China Political Economy (2020).
Talk to us support@bestqualitywriters.com