|
1
Unsatisfactory 0%-71%
71.00% |
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72%-75%
75.00% |
3
Satisfactory 76%-83%
79.00% |
4
Good 84%-89%
89.00% |
5
Excellent 90% – 100%
100.00% |
80.0 %Content |
|
20.0 %Research problem and purpose |
Does not mention research problem or purpose of study. |
There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem. |
The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate. |
The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing. |
The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed. |
|
20.0 %Research objective, questions or hypotheses |
Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses. |
There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses. |
The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate. |
The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods. |
Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher. |
|
20.0 %Literature Review |
Does not mention literature review. |
There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review. |
The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study. |
The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described. |
The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question. |
|
20.0 %Frame of Reference (qualitative) |
Does not mention frame of reference |
There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference. |
The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate. |
The frame of reference is described. |
The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology. |
|
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions |
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
5.0 %Format |
|
2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) |
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
100 %Total Weightage |
|
|