|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvided a 7 week goal and draw a goal line for Savannah
|
| 5 pts
Candidate provided a 7 week goal AND drew a goal line on the graph for Savannah.
|
3 pts
Candidate provided a 7 week goal but did not draw a goal line on the graph (or incorrectly drew the goal line on the graph) for Savannah OR candidate did not provide a 7 week goal, but did correctly draw a goal line on the graph.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not provide a 7 week goal AND did not draw a goal line OR candidate did not submit a graph.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraph Savannah’s scores for 7 weeks on the graph
|
| 7 pts
Candidate correctly graphed all 7 data points on the graph.
|
4 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 5-6 data points on the graph.
|
2 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 3-4 data points on the graph.
|
1 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 1-2 data points on the graph.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly graph any data points OR did not submit a graph.
|
|
7pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a goal line for Grayson
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly created a goal line for Grayson.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly create a goal line for Grayson OR did not submit a graph.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlot Grayson’s 8 data points for Tier 2
|
| 8 pts
Candidate correctly graphed all 8 data points for Grayson’s Tier 2 progress.
|
5 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 5-7 data points for Grayson’s Tier 2 progress.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 1-4 data points for Grayson’s Tier 2 progress.
|
0 pts
No Marks
Candidate did not correctly graph any data points OR did not submit a graph for Grayson.
|
|
8pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScore a Passage Reading Fluency probe for Sam
|
| 5 pts
Candidate scored Sam’s PRF probe correctly with no errors.
|
3 pts
Candidate scored Sam’s PRF probe correctly but with 1-2 errors.
|
0 pts
Candidate scored Sam’s PRF probe but there more than 3 errors.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe Sam’s PRF score in relation to the 55 wpm benchmark.
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly described Sam’s PRF probe score in relation to the benchmark.
|
0 pts
Candidate incorrectly described Sam’s PRF probe score in relation to the benchmark.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraph Samaria’s last 6 data points for weeks 17-22
|
| 6 pts
Candidate correctly graphed all 6 data points for Samaria’s Tier 2 progress.
|
4 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 3-5 data points for Samaria’s Tier 2 progress.
|
2 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 1-2 data points for Samaria’s Tier 2 progress.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly graph any data points for Samaria’s Tier 2 progress OR did not submit a graph for Samaria.
|
|
6pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssess Samaria’s performance in relation to her goal line and parent communication
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly assessed Samaria’s performance in relation to her goal line AND provided two points that would be communicated and shared with the parents about her reading performance.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly assessed Samaria’s performance in relation to her goal line but did not provide two points that would be communicated and shared with the parents about her reading performance OR candidate did not correctly assess Samaria’s performance, but did provide two points that would be communicated and shared with the parents about her reading performance.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly assess Samaria’s performance in relation to her goal line AND did not provide at least two points that would be communicated to parents about her reading performance.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrectly score Alejandro’s PRF probe
|
| 5 pts
Candidate scored Alejandro’s PRF probe correctly with no errors.
|
3 pts
Candidate scored Alejandro’s PRF probe correctly but with 1-2 errors.
|
0 pts
Candidate scored Sam’s PRF probe but there more than 3 errors.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGraph Alejandro’s 7 data points
|
| 7 pts
Candidate correctly graphed all 7 data points for Alejandro’s progress in Tier 1.
|
4 pts
Candidate correctly graphed all 4-6 data points for Alejandro’s progress in Tier 1.
|
2 pts
Candidate correctly graphed 1-3 data points for Alejandro’s progress in Tier 1.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly graph any data points for Alejandro’s Tier 1 progress OR did not submit a graph for Alejandro.
|
|
7pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlot the Week 7 Benchmark and create a goal line for Alejandro
|
| 5 pts
Candidate correctly plotted the Week 7 benchmark AND created a goal line for Alejandro.
|
3 pts
Candidate correctly plotted the Week 7 benchmark but did not create a goal line for Alejandro OR did not correctly plot the Week 7 benchmark, but did create a goal line for Alejandro,
|
0 pts
Candidate did not correctly plot the Week 7 benchmark AND did not create a goal line for Grayson OR did not submit a graph.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecide whether Alejandro is meeting the established goal (Is he responding adequately to the general education instruction?) A rationale is provided.
|
| 5 pts
Candidate determined whether Alejandro is meeting his established goal AND provided a rationale.
|
3 pts
Candidate determined whether Alejandro is meeting his established goal but did not provide a rationale.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not determine whether Alejandro is meeting his established goal AND did not provide a rationale.
|
|
5pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAlejandro’s Parent Meeting and Communication
|
| 6 pts
Candidate listed at least 3 points to discuss with Alejandro’s parents regarding his progress in Tier 1.
|
4 pts
Candidate listed at least 2 points to discuss with Alejandro’s parents regarding his progress in Tier 1.
|
2 pts
Candidate listed at least 1 point to discuss with Alejandro’s parents regarding his progress in Tier 1.
|
0 pts
Candidate did not provide any points to discuss with Alejandro’s parents regarding his progress in Tier 1 instruction.
|
|
6pts
|
|
Total Points: 74
|
downloaddocument and complete the assignment for each case study. Pay special attention to the STAR Sheets because they provide you with the instructions on how to complete the assignment in each case study. Submit your answers to the IRIS Progress Monitoring Case Studies 
Talk to us support@bestqualitywriters.com