Anatomy homework help

/in /by

Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map
Purpose of Assignment
For this assignment, you will demonstrate knowledge of the diagnostic process using the template below.  You will identify common assessment data, three priority nursing diagnoses, client-centered outcomes, and nursing interventions with rationale for a client with impaired immunity.
Course Competency

  • Describe strategies for safe effective multidimensional nursing practice when providing care for clients experiencing immunologic, infectious and inflammatory disorders.

Instructions
Use the template directly below these instructions to complete a care map to design care for a client with impaired immunity.
Tom Howard, a 45-year old man with HIV from the community, has come to the clinic because he reports he had not been feeling well recently.  During the intake process, Tom complains of a dry cough and chilling.  The intake nurse takes his vital signs, and they are:  Temp 102 degrees Fahrenheit, Pulse 102, Respirations 28 breaths per minute, Blood pressure 135/86.  The clinic physician refers Tom to the local hospital for a suspected opportunistic infection.
 
 
 
 

Subjective Subjective Subjective
Objective Objective Objective
Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic
     
Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis
     
SMART Goal SMART Goal SMART Goal
     
Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions
     

Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map Rubric
Total Assessment Points – 65

Levels of Achievement
Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery
Data Collection
(10 Pts)		 Lacks several basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, and other diagnostic tests. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, other diagnostic tests and health history.
Points –  0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
Nursing Hypothesis/Diagnosis (should fit the data)
(10 Pts)		 Nursing hypothesis/diagnosis is insufficient and/or does not fit the data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with little connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with an adequate connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with a strong connection to identified data.
Points – 0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
SMART Goal (should reflect the diagnosis and follow guidelines)
 (15 Pts)		 The goal meets few SMART goal guidelines and/or is not related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets some of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets most of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets all of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis.
Points – 0-11 Points – 12 Points – 13 Points – 14-15
Interventions and Rationale
(20 Pts)		 Lacks appropriate interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem. Write 3 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Write 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Writes more than 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references.
Points – 0-15 Points – 16 Points – 17-18 Points –19- 20
APA Citation
(5 Pts)		 APA in-text citations and references are missing. Attempted to use APA in-text citations and references. APA in-text citations and references are used with few errors. APA in-text citations and references are used correctly.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5
Spelling and Grammar
 (5 Pts)		 Numerous spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.  
Some spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.		 Few spelling and grammar errors. Minimal to no spelling and grammar errors.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5

 
 
Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map
Purpose of Assignment
For this assignment, you will demonstrate knowledge of the diagnostic process using the template below.  You will identify common assessment data, three priority nursing diagnoses, client-centered outcomes, and nursing interventions with rationale for a client with impaired immunity.
Course Competency

  • Describe strategies for safe effective multidimensional nursing practice when providing care for clients experiencing immunologic, infectious and inflammatory disorders.

Instructions
Use the template directly below these instructions to complete a care map to design care for a client with impaired immunity.
Tom Howard, a 45-year old man with HIV from the community, has come to the clinic because he reports he had not been feeling well recently.  During the intake process, Tom complains of a dry cough and chilling.  The intake nurse takes his vital signs, and they are:  Temp 102 degrees Fahrenheit, Pulse 102, Respirations 28 breaths per minute, Blood pressure 135/86.  The clinic physician refers Tom to the local hospital for a suspected opportunistic infection.
 
 
 
 

Subjective Subjective Subjective
Objective Objective Objective
Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic
     
Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis
     
SMART Goal SMART Goal SMART Goal
     
Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions
     

Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map Rubric
Total Assessment Points – 65

Levels of Achievement
Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery
Data Collection
(10 Pts)		 Lacks several basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, and other diagnostic tests. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, other diagnostic tests and health history.
Points –  0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
Nursing Hypothesis/Diagnosis (should fit the data)
(10 Pts)		 Nursing hypothesis/diagnosis is insufficient and/or does not fit the data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with little connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with an adequate connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with a strong connection to identified data.
Points – 0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
SMART Goal (should reflect the diagnosis and follow guidelines)
 (15 Pts)		 The goal meets few SMART goal guidelines and/or is not related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets some of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets most of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets all of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis.
Points – 0-11 Points – 12 Points – 13 Points – 14-15
Interventions and Rationale
(20 Pts)		 Lacks appropriate interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem. Write 3 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Write 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Writes more than 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references.
Points – 0-15 Points – 16 Points – 17-18 Points –19- 20
APA Citation
(5 Pts)		 APA in-text citations and references are missing. Attempted to use APA in-text citations and references. APA in-text citations and references are used with few errors. APA in-text citations and references are used correctly.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5
Spelling and Grammar
 (5 Pts)		 Numerous spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.  
Some spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.		 Few spelling and grammar errors. Minimal to no spelling and grammar errors.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5

 
 
 

Anatomy homework help

/in /by

Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map
Purpose of Assignment
For this assignment, you will demonstrate knowledge of the diagnostic process using the template below.  You will identify common assessment data, three priority nursing diagnoses, client-centered outcomes, and nursing interventions with rationale for a client with impaired immunity.
Course Competency

  • Describe strategies for safe effective multidimensional nursing practice when providing care for clients experiencing immunologic, infectious and inflammatory disorders.

Instructions
Use the template directly below these instructions to complete a care map to design care for a client with impaired immunity.
Tom Howard, a 45-year old man with HIV from the community, has come to the clinic because he reports he had not been feeling well recently.  During the intake process, Tom complains of a dry cough and chilling.  The intake nurse takes his vital signs, and they are:  Temp 102 degrees Fahrenheit, Pulse 102, Respirations 28 breaths per minute, Blood pressure 135/86.  The clinic physician refers Tom to the local hospital for a suspected opportunistic infection.
 
 
 
 

Subjective Subjective Subjective
Objective Objective Objective
Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic
     
Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis
     
SMART Goal SMART Goal SMART Goal
     
Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions
     

Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map Rubric
Total Assessment Points – 65

Levels of Achievement
Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery
Data Collection
(10 Pts)		 Lacks several basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, and other diagnostic tests. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, other diagnostic tests and health history.
Points –  0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
Nursing Hypothesis/Diagnosis (should fit the data)
(10 Pts)		 Nursing hypothesis/diagnosis is insufficient and/or does not fit the data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with little connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with an adequate connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with a strong connection to identified data.
Points – 0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
SMART Goal (should reflect the diagnosis and follow guidelines)
 (15 Pts)		 The goal meets few SMART goal guidelines and/or is not related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets some of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets most of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets all of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis.
Points – 0-11 Points – 12 Points – 13 Points – 14-15
Interventions and Rationale
(20 Pts)		 Lacks appropriate interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem. Write 3 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Write 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Writes more than 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references.
Points – 0-15 Points – 16 Points – 17-18 Points –19- 20
APA Citation
(5 Pts)		 APA in-text citations and references are missing. Attempted to use APA in-text citations and references. APA in-text citations and references are used with few errors. APA in-text citations and references are used correctly.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5
Spelling and Grammar
 (5 Pts)		 Numerous spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.  
Some spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.		 Few spelling and grammar errors. Minimal to no spelling and grammar errors.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5

 
 
Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map
Purpose of Assignment
For this assignment, you will demonstrate knowledge of the diagnostic process using the template below.  You will identify common assessment data, three priority nursing diagnoses, client-centered outcomes, and nursing interventions with rationale for a client with impaired immunity.
Course Competency

  • Describe strategies for safe effective multidimensional nursing practice when providing care for clients experiencing immunologic, infectious and inflammatory disorders.

Instructions
Use the template directly below these instructions to complete a care map to design care for a client with impaired immunity.
Tom Howard, a 45-year old man with HIV from the community, has come to the clinic because he reports he had not been feeling well recently.  During the intake process, Tom complains of a dry cough and chilling.  The intake nurse takes his vital signs, and they are:  Temp 102 degrees Fahrenheit, Pulse 102, Respirations 28 breaths per minute, Blood pressure 135/86.  The clinic physician refers Tom to the local hospital for a suspected opportunistic infection.
 
 
 
 

Subjective Subjective Subjective
Objective Objective Objective
Diagnostic Diagnostic Diagnostic
     
Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis Nursing Diagnosis
     
SMART Goal SMART Goal SMART Goal
     
Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions Nursing Interventions
     

Module 09 Assignment – Impaired Immune System Care Map Rubric
Total Assessment Points – 65

Levels of Achievement
Criteria Emerging Competence Proficiency Mastery
Data Collection
(10 Pts)		 Lacks several basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process and common lab work. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, and other diagnostic tests. Identifies all basic factors of the disease process, common lab work, other diagnostic tests and health history.
Points –  0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
Nursing Hypothesis/Diagnosis (should fit the data)
(10 Pts)		 Nursing hypothesis/diagnosis is insufficient and/or does not fit the data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with little connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with an adequate connection to identified data. Writes nursing hypothesis/diagnosis in the correct format with a strong connection to identified data.
Points – 0-7 Points – 8 Points – 9 Points – 10
SMART Goal (should reflect the diagnosis and follow guidelines)
 (15 Pts)		 The goal meets few SMART goal guidelines and/or is not related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets some of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets most of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis. The goal meets all of the SMART goal guidelines and is related to the nursing diagnosis.
Points – 0-11 Points – 12 Points – 13 Points – 14-15
Interventions and Rationale
(20 Pts)		 Lacks appropriate interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem. Write 3 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Write 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references. Writes more than 5 interventions to assist the client in resolving the factors leading to the problem with appropriate references.
Points – 0-15 Points – 16 Points – 17-18 Points –19- 20
APA Citation
(5 Pts)		 APA in-text citations and references are missing. Attempted to use APA in-text citations and references. APA in-text citations and references are used with few errors. APA in-text citations and references are used correctly.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5
Spelling and Grammar
 (5 Pts)		 Numerous spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.  
Some spelling and grammar errors, which detract from the audience’s ability to comprehend material.		 Few spelling and grammar errors. Minimal to no spelling and grammar errors.
Points- 0-2 Points- 3 Points- 4 Points- 5

 
 
 

Anatomy homework help

/in /by
Read chapter 40: Musculoskeletal Systems Function
The nurse in the outpatient orthopedic clinic is reviewing the medical records of several patients being seen in the clinic today. In the most recent note by the provider, the nurse reads the following:
‘A 67-year-old, moderately obese woman examined today for increasing back and left shoulder pain. Limited circumduction of left arm noted in comparison with right arm. Strength of left arm is less than right, with less muscle definition in the left arm. Examination of back indicates significant kyphosis, and the patient states that she is ‘shrinking.’ Bone density testing of the hip is ordered.”
1. How does the nurse interpret “limited circumduction”
2. When the patient arrives, the nurse correlates the “kyphosis” with what physical finding? What causes kyphosis in the older adult?
3. How should the nurse explain the patient’s decreasing height?
4. What is the rationale for ordering bone density testing of the hip in this patient?
DO NOT EMAIL ASSIGNMENTS. PLEASE UPLOAD ALL ASSIGNMENTS TO CANVAS. LATE ASSIGNMENTS WILL NOT BE GRADED!!! PLEASE

Anatomy homework help

/in /by
Read chapter 40: Musculoskeletal Systems Function
The nurse in the outpatient orthopedic clinic is reviewing the medical records of several patients being seen in the clinic today. In the most recent note by the provider, the nurse reads the following:
‘A 67-year-old, moderately obese woman examined today for increasing back and left shoulder pain. Limited circumduction of left arm noted in comparison with right arm. Strength of left arm is less than right, with less muscle definition in the left arm. Examination of back indicates significant kyphosis, and the patient states that she is ‘shrinking.’ Bone density testing of the hip is ordered.”
1. How does the nurse interpret “limited circumduction”
2. When the patient arrives, the nurse correlates the “kyphosis” with what physical finding? What causes kyphosis in the older adult?
3. How should the nurse explain the patient’s decreasing height?
4. What is the rationale for ordering bone density testing of the hip in this patient?
DO NOT EMAIL ASSIGNMENTS. PLEASE UPLOAD ALL ASSIGNMENTS TO CANVAS. LATE ASSIGNMENTS WILL NOT BE GRADED!!! PLEASE

Biology homework help

/in /by
Length: 5-6 pages typed double space
Font: Arial or Cambria, size 12
Topic selected from Chapters of PART III Biomedical Basis of Public Health
or PART IV Social and Behavioral Factors in Health
References (5)
Sources can be books, journals, websites, and newspapers. Five references cited should be a mixture of these types, rather than all of one type.
In the text simply cite the author and year in parentheses. Example: (Jones et al, 2013)
In the reference section list the authors, title, year of publication, Journal title, volume, page no.
Compston, A, Coles A, Multiple Sclerosis. Lancet (2008) 372: 1502-1517.

Biology homework help

/in /by
Length: 5-6 pages typed double space
Font: Arial or Cambria, size 12
Topic selected from Chapters of PART III Biomedical Basis of Public Health
or PART IV Social and Behavioral Factors in Health
References (5)
Sources can be books, journals, websites, and newspapers. Five references cited should be a mixture of these types, rather than all of one type.
In the text simply cite the author and year in parentheses. Example: (Jones et al, 2013)
In the reference section list the authors, title, year of publication, Journal title, volume, page no.
Compston, A, Coles A, Multiple Sclerosis. Lancet (2008) 372: 1502-1517.

Anatomy homework help

/in /by
  1. Write a brief abstract (2       or 3 sentences) of the article (be careful not to use the authors’       abstract!)
  2. Review each section (e.g. title, abstract, introduction,       methods/participants, results, discussion).   Describe the       positives and negatives of the article.  How could it be written       better? Are the purpose and rationale for doing the study stated       clearly?  Are the descriptions of the procedures and participants       adequate?  Was it a good study overall? (please note that       this is not an exhaustive list of information you can include)        IDEAS:

i. Title Does the title describe the study methodology and participants, at least?
ii. Abstract Does it adequately (and accurately) describe the study?
iii. Introduction
1.Briefly summarize (in one or two sentences)
2.Is the topic described/explained so that you, someone who may not be familiar with the subject, understand the basic concepts, the ultimate goal of the project, and the rationale behind the need for this information?
3.What are the authors’ hypotheses?
4.Describe any changes or information that could be added to make it clearer
iv. Methods
1.Briefly summarize (in one or two sentences)
2.Are the methods explained well enough that you could replicate this study (assuming equipment, etc. is available).  Consider the criteria used for subject selection.  Were enough subjects tested? Was it a case study?  Could they have tested more participants? How was the room set up? Did the authors adequately describe everything? Etc.
v. Results
1.Specific statistical methods do not need to be addressed
2.Comment on chart, tables, etc.
a. Is the presentation of the data clear?
b.Can you understand the content of the table or chart without the text?
c. Could changes have been made to make it more clear?
vi. Discussion section:
1.Did the discussion summarize well enough? Include implications, etc?
2.Were conclusions drawn?
3.Were the questions answered/ hypotheses correct?
4.Is there any information that could have been discussed further?
5.What questions are left unanswered?  Did the authors mention shortcomings (i.e., limitations) or future research?

  1. Critique should be no more than 2 pages double-spaced. Please upload      clearly named files to blackboard.  Emailed critiques will not be      accepted.
    1. Avoid quotes
  • attachment

    childhoodapraxiaarticle.pdf

Anatomy homework help

/in /by
  1. Write a brief abstract (2       or 3 sentences) of the article (be careful not to use the authors’       abstract!)
  2. Review each section (e.g. title, abstract, introduction,       methods/participants, results, discussion).   Describe the       positives and negatives of the article.  How could it be written       better? Are the purpose and rationale for doing the study stated       clearly?  Are the descriptions of the procedures and participants       adequate?  Was it a good study overall? (please note that       this is not an exhaustive list of information you can include)        IDEAS:

i. Title Does the title describe the study methodology and participants, at least?
ii. Abstract Does it adequately (and accurately) describe the study?
iii. Introduction
1.Briefly summarize (in one or two sentences)
2.Is the topic described/explained so that you, someone who may not be familiar with the subject, understand the basic concepts, the ultimate goal of the project, and the rationale behind the need for this information?
3.What are the authors’ hypotheses?
4.Describe any changes or information that could be added to make it clearer
iv. Methods
1.Briefly summarize (in one or two sentences)
2.Are the methods explained well enough that you could replicate this study (assuming equipment, etc. is available).  Consider the criteria used for subject selection.  Were enough subjects tested? Was it a case study?  Could they have tested more participants? How was the room set up? Did the authors adequately describe everything? Etc.
v. Results
1.Specific statistical methods do not need to be addressed
2.Comment on chart, tables, etc.
a. Is the presentation of the data clear?
b.Can you understand the content of the table or chart without the text?
c. Could changes have been made to make it more clear?
vi. Discussion section:
1.Did the discussion summarize well enough? Include implications, etc?
2.Were conclusions drawn?
3.Were the questions answered/ hypotheses correct?
4.Is there any information that could have been discussed further?
5.What questions are left unanswered?  Did the authors mention shortcomings (i.e., limitations) or future research?

  1. Critique should be no more than 2 pages double-spaced. Please upload      clearly named files to blackboard.  Emailed critiques will not be      accepted.
    1. Avoid quotes
  • attachment

    childhoodapraxiaarticle.pdf

Anatomy homework help

/in /by
  1. Write a brief abstract (2       or 3 sentences) of the article (be careful not to use the authors’       abstract!)
  2. Review each section (e.g. title, abstract, introduction,       methods/participants, results, discussion).   Describe the       positives and negatives of the article.  How could it be written       better? Are the purpose and rationale for doing the study stated       clearly?  Are the descriptions of the procedures and participants       adequate?  Was it a good study overall? (please note that       this is not an exhaustive list of information you can include)        IDEAS:

i. Title Does the title describe the study methodology and participants, at least?
ii. Abstract Does it adequately (and accurately) describe the study?
iii. Introduction
1.Briefly summarize (in one or two sentences)
2.Is the topic described/explained so that you, someone who may not be familiar with the subject, understand the basic concepts, the ultimate goal of the project, and the rationale behind the need for this information?
3.What are the authors’ hypotheses?
4.Describe any changes or information that could be added to make it clearer
iv. Methods
1.Briefly summarize (in one or two sentences)
2.Are the methods explained well enough that you could replicate this study (assuming equipment, etc. is available).  Consider the criteria used for subject selection.  Were enough subjects tested? Was it a case study?  Could they have tested more participants? How was the room set up? Did the authors adequately describe everything? Etc.
v. Results
1.Specific statistical methods do not need to be addressed
2.Comment on chart, tables, etc.
a. Is the presentation of the data clear?
b.Can you understand the content of the table or chart without the text?
c. Could changes have been made to make it more clear?
vi. Discussion section:
1.Did the discussion summarize well enough? Include implications, etc?
2.Were conclusions drawn?
3.Were the questions answered/ hypotheses correct?
4.Is there any information that could have been discussed further?
5.What questions are left unanswered?  Did the authors mention shortcomings (i.e., limitations) or future research?

  1. Critique should be no more than 2 pages double-spaced. Please upload      clearly named files to blackboard.  Emailed critiques will not be      accepted.
    1. Avoid quotes
  • attachment

    childhoodapraxiaarticle.pdf