Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminDiscussion Questions: Discuss the unique characteristics and risk of the Food and Agriculture and the Healthcare and Public Health sectors. How are the public and private sectors being coordinated to assist in securing these sectors?
Use References attached and links below.
Food and Agriculture
– https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/targets-terrorism-food-and-agriculture
– https://www.cisa.gov/food-and-agriculture-sector
Healthcare and Public Health
– https://www.cisa.gov/healthcare-and-public-health-sector
-
NCCIC-MedicalDevices.pdf
-
nipp-ssp-healthcare-and-public-health-2010.pdf
Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminThere are three primary forms of state-sponsored voter suppression: The first makes it harder for people to register to vote. The second makes it harder for people to get to the polls. The third manipulates precinct boundaries to dilute or concentrate the vote for one party. There are also illegal voter suppression activities, like the destruction of voter registration cards.
Voter registration suppression examples include:
- Stricter voter ID laws such as accepting only certain kinds of IDs, requiring certain kinds of documentation to get IDs, and requiring certain kinds of photos
- Residency requirements and address requirements
- “Intention to stay” requirements
- Restrictions on voter registration drives
- Elimination of Election Day voter registration
- Voter purges (when eligible voters are removed from voter rolls improperly, often without notice to voters)
- Felony disenfranchisement
Voting barrier examples include:
- Closing polling stations. For example, between 2012 and 2018, 8% of voting precincts in Georgia were closed and 40% of voting precincts were relocated in the state, preventing between 54,000 to 85,000 voters from voting on Election Day in 2018
- Barriers related to disability
- Voter intimidation tactics like armed observers at polling places
- Long lines at voting places
Knowing what you now know about voter suppression:
- How has voter suppression affected the current presidential election?
- How has the current presidential administration use voter suppression as a means to win political tactic?
- How would you counter voter suppression within your own communities?
Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminWhat are some key considerations for interagency cooperation that influence the Commander and Joint Task Forces Commander in the development/execution of operations? Also, describe one of the interagency and why it is important as a future SGM/CSM to understand interagency cooperation.
Post a substantial initial response, with at least 2 cited sources and a minimum of 250 words, to the topic below. Identify references following the post using APA format.
Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminQ1
I personally do not believe that a bussiness owner has the right to deny service to same-sex couples. These are progressive times and the world has been coming to accept all different kinds of people over the years. Just because slavery was permitted under law a hundred or so years ago did not make it right. The law is not always correct or moral. We now have corrected that notion and have implented all people into society regardless of skin color. The same should be true for same-sex couples.
Using the argument of religion as an objection to bake a wedding cake for gay marraige means that African-Americans should still be objected under the same logic. The religon is not the problem in this case it is the problem of a person that is unwilling to adapt to society or accept anyone that is different from themselves. The “KKK” Is nowhere near the same as a same-sex couple. The “KKK” is a harmful organization that is hateful and disriminatory. Same sex couples do no harm to anyone and are just trying to express their individual sexuality. Opposition of same-sex couples is similar to a hateful/discriminatory organization and maybe in that case people should not be working for weddings if they are opposed to any type of gender getting married.
The fact that this kind of behaviour is not outlawed can be considered a paralell from dicrimation of Africation americans during segregation. Eventually it was adopted by the government as public opinion gained tracion in favor towards equality of skin color. The same will happen with gay marraige over the years as public opinion towards it has increased tremendously over the years. Aporximately 10,000,000 people in the United States are considered part of LGBT so this issue definetly is not small. Not giving rights to a certain group of people is basically admitting that they are less than anyone else in society when this is false.
I hope to one day see a world where skin color, race, sexuality and any other types of human discrepancies are not an issue in day to day society and we can all live in harmony and peace as under one label of people/citizens of America all protected under equal law.
Question2
No, business owners and/or government officials should not be allowed to deny service to same-sex couples because of religious beliefs. Yes, we have the right of freedom of religion, whether it be Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, or no religion at all. Yet our government was also founded on the idea of separation of church and state. So why is it acceptable to allow Christianity to govern us, when fundamentally our government is supposed to respect the separation of church and state.
“He does not have the absolute right to exercise and practice such beliefs in utter disregard of the clear constitutional rights of other citizens.” That is the best line I have heard and gets right to the core of this issue, and I will definitely be using it in the future. Members of the LQBTQ+ community have the right to be happy, should have the right to the same services as straight people, and absolutely should have the right to be themselves. You can feel one way about something, but if that belief goes against the rights of others, you can not practice that belief because it interferes with someone elses rights.
I think (and hope) that the case with the wedding cake will result in the motion that refusing to bake a cake for same sex marriage is inherently discrimination. If a bakery were to turn down a woman who wanted a cake because she is a woman, that would be discrimination. I cannot be refused service from a place because I am a woman. A black person can not be turned down from a restaurant just because of the color of their skin. Everyone has the right to live the exact same way as everyone else. LGBTQ+ people have the absolute right to be with the ones they love, and celebrate it too. Personally, if I was gay I would want to go to a bakery that supported me. I don’t want to give my business to someone who is disrespectful to who I am.
I am honestly amazed at how we are in 2020, almost 2021, and same sex marriage is still an issue. If you are arguing against the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals, remember that the Bible calls us to love everyone.
Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminDue in 48 hrs.
-
DanielsPost.docx
-
IrvinsPost.docx
-
Benjamins.docx
-
LarrysPost.docx
Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminDiscuss the challenges in Homeland Security and beyond listed in the National Security Strategy (2017). Are there other challenges that the US should address that are not included? If so, what are they?
Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminAssume the role of a local administration of a hypothetical city. You have been advised that a military installation within your political borders is expected to expand by 50%. Develop solutions to the following concerns raised by citizens within your city:
- Citizens have raised concerns with respect to the need for increased police and fire service to accommodate the expected increase in population.
- Existing roads leading to and from the military instillation are already becoming congested and citizens are demanding expanded public transportation.
- Local schools are 30 years old and in need of updating. The expected increase in population will add additional stress to the aging buildings, accelerating the need for updating.
- Current waste management within your city are incapable of accepting the expected increase in solid waste and sewage. Expansion of waste management facilities will require coordination with a neighboring city.
- Your city’s water supply, a local reservoir, requires dredging and updates to its intake facilities to accommodate population growth.
Your proposed response to each concern should account for funding, additional personnel, and other additional factors you deem important. Where appropriate, explain whether or not your proposed solution will required coordination with other political subdivisions, cities, or the Federal Government.
Government homework help
/in Government homework help /by adminThe Death penalty is nowadays an expression that is used in justice for a case of someone who has committed a very serious crime. some years ago Death penalty was really hard as a punishment for condamning a criminal to receive death as a punishment for his or her crimes committed. this may be a good option for those who have been victims, but for some other such as family members of the person who has committed the crime, this decicion will not make them happy because despite the fact that their family member committed a crime, he or she is still a human being and deserves some rights.
Now with the presence of human right organization, the Death penalty is no longer the same as it was in the past, because their are so many other ways to punish someone who has committed a crime. however, the death penalty depends on one country to another. for some country the death penalty still remain death as punishment, for example, the criminal must be killed using a gun shot, or bullet; some other must be killed by being hanged. for some african traditions, the criminal was burried alive, that decisions made other people to fear committing crimes, but so many people complained about it and the decision was changed.
For other country now, the death penalty has changed the way of its punishment, the criminal will no longer be killed, but will receive a life imprisonment.
In my own opinion, somewhat i support and i do not support. on this hand if i say i support, this means that when this punishment is being executed, so many people will have fear of commiting crimes and the level of crimes will reduce for no one like to die. on the other hand, i do not support death penalty because it is to hard to bear it, if i could imagine that the criminal is my family member, despite the evil did i will prefer him to get jaiilled for life than being eliminated forever, in prison there will be a way to see him.
Texas and US shouldn’t carry out the death penalty but they must find out what punishment is good for such crime committed, some crime despite being crimes do not deserve a death penalty, criminal can go do farm works while being in prison.
Question 2
In my opinion, I think the death penalty should be abolished because of many reasons. Many people believe the saying ‘an eye for an eye’. But when people will realize that just because someone may have killed a loved one does not mean the best way for that person is to die also. People do not realize that they are putting the blood of another person life on their hands. This makes them just as guilty as the person who committed the crime: the only difference is that they did not use weapon except their mouth to kill them. The death penalty should be abolished because it is racist, punished the poor, condemns those who are innocent to death, and is a cruel punishment
The death penalty is irreversible. Absolute judgements may lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit. Texas man Cameron Todd Willingam was executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his three daughters. Following his execution, further evidence revealed that Willingam did not set the fire that caused their deaths but it came too late.
We can deny that the death penalty makes a public spectacle of an individual’s death. It means executions are often undertaken in an extremely public manner, with public hangings in Iran or live broadcasts of lethal injections in the US. According to UN human rights experts, executions in public serve no legitimate purpose and only increase the cruel, inhuman and degrading nature of this punishment.
Everyone always has the right to live, and we all have the right to be free from cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. These are human rights that people have, regardless of whether they have been convicted of crimes. The death penalty violates these basic rights.
complete at least two responses (the “Final Posts”) of at least 200 words each to classmates
ABOUT US
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Talk to us support@bestqualitywriters.com