Health Medical Homework Help

Purdue University Nursing Tuskegee Syphilis Study Discussion

 

Human research in scientific studies has a dark past. While not all scientific studies of the past were unethical, many were; and in present day, there are policies and procedures that researchers must follow to carry out ethical research.
For the Unit 2 Assignment, you will review historical human research studies that violated what are considered basic human rights when it comes to protecting research participants. You will also apply the four principles of ethical research to these historical research studies and discuss how the IRB process could have prevented these studies from violating human rights.


Please choose an article from “A Selected History of Research With Humans” in the Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics and review Chapter 8 from A Survival Guide for Health Research Methods. Then, complete the following:

  1. Provide a short summary of the article you chose and why you chose it.
  2. Describe at least three ways the historical human research specifically violated each of the four principles of ethical research: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and nonmaleficence.
  3. Discuss three ways the IRB process would have prevented the study from being carried out.

Assignment guidelines

You may complete the assignment in any of the following ways. Please be sure to review the minimum submission requirements for each option:

  • A document, written as an APA formatted paper.
  • A PowerPoint® presentation with speaker notes.

Requirements:

For the document option:

  • Your submission is composed in a Microsoft® Word® document.
  • To meet the objective requirements, your response is at least 500 words in length.
  • Your submission includes specific examples of concepts, topics, definitions, and other elements to demonstrate mastery of the objective.
  • Your submission includes a highly developed viewpoint and purpose.
  • Your response is in Standard English and demonstrates superior organization.
  • Your communication is highly ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful.
  • Your submission displays exceptional content, organization, style, and mechanics.
  • A separate page at the end of your response contains a list of references.
  • Include both in-text and reference list citations where appropriate and reference all sources used following proper APA citation style.
  • Please review the APA formatting and citation style in Academic Writer which can be found through Academic Tools.

For the PowerPoint option:

  • Your submission is created in a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation. The presentation is saved and uploaded as a PDF document.
  • To meet the objective requirements, your presentation is at least 6 slides in length and a minimum of 500 words, including the slides and speaker’s notes. Speaker’s notes are submitted in a separate Microsoft Word or PDF document.
  • Your submission includes specific examples of concepts, topics, definitions, and other elements to demonstrate mastery of the objective.
  • Your submission includes a highly developed viewpoint and purpose.
  • Your response is in Standard English and demonstrates superior organization.
  • Your communication is highly ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful.
  • Your submission displays exceptional content, organization, style, and mechanics.
  • A separate slide at the end of your presentation contains a list of references.
  • Include both in-text and reference list citations where appropriate and reference all sources used following proper APA citation style.
  • Please review the APA formatting and citation style in Academic Writer which can be found through Academic Tools.