Information Systems homework help
Information Systems homework help. Module Code: COMP 1004 Module Name: System Analysis and Design Concepts Level: 2 Max. Marks: 100 System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 2 of 11 (10 Marks) Task 2: Read the following scenario, understand and present your response in a report with a number of words between 1200 and 1500. The goal of your project is to develop an Information System which will automate one or more business functions. You will conduct all activities and prepare deliverable products associated with the System analysis process. At the conclusion of your study, you will prepare a comprehensive, high-quality assignment report containing your results. (90 Marks) Options: Human Resource Management System Recruitment Management System Training Management System Appraisal / incentive System Payroll, Leave and attendance system Supply Chain Management System Production system Warehouse management system Order management system Delivery Management system Accounts and Finance Management System Payment management system Cash management system Please choose any one of the options given here based on your specialization and complete your assignment. I. Doing the Assignment Assume that the report is being prepared for management. This means that you need to be clear and concise about your recommendations and that you should present the basic ideas and System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 3 of 11 recommendations in the report simply and with no extraneous information. Other relevant information and supporting evidence is to appear in appendices. Your report should include information on the following items: 1. Write an introduction which includes a description of the organization you chose to study. (10 marks) 2. Choose an appropriate methodology according to the type of Information System and justify your answer. (10 marks) 3. Identify the problem that led to the development of the project. You need to apply appropriate data collection methods to determine the user requirements and the relevant information about it. You need to include the evidences in the appendices (interview questions, questionnaire results,…). (20 marks) 4. Conduct a literature review to study similar systems. (10 marks) 5. Study another alternative of the proposed system and evaluate it based on evaluation criteria. (At least four evaluation criteria need to be identified). (10 marks) 6. Suggest an information system that addresses the user requirements and determine at least four features of the proposed system. (10 marks) 7. Study one type of feasibility for the proposed system (economic, technical, legal and contractual,…). (10 marks) 8. Write a reflective writing section that summarizes the contents of your work, learning and experiences. (10 marks) Viva / Presentation: There are no separate marks for viva and presentation. The assignment will be judged based on the knowledge and understanding of the student. Note: (i) All the marks will depend on viva voce during presentation. Your assignment should include a cover page indicating your name, title of work, course, date, and name of the instructor. Make sure that drawings are clear and legible. Keep in mind that you will be judged on visual appearance, in addition to grammatical correctness and quality of writing. The text must be well-structured, with paragraphs, full sentences and all the other features of a well-written report. Your report must not consist of itemized lists of points. The report should not System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 4 of 11 exceed 20 pages (not counting references, appendices, figures or tables.) Text font size should be 12 points. Rules & Regulations: All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using CU Harvard Style and page numbers. Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of the faculty. Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle. Viva will be conducted after the assignment submission as per the dates informed earlier. Guidelines: Assignment must be computer typed. Font – Times New Roman Font – Style – Regular Font – Size – 12 Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline. Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable software or by pencil. Each student has to do the assignment individually / Students have to do the assignment collaboratively and each student should write a brief reflection on their contribution and learnings from group work. You can refer books in eLibrary or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources. Important Policies to be followed 1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*: MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled. All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below mentioned categories: System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 5 of 11 1. Plagiarism 2. Malpractice 3. Ghost Writing 4. Collusion 5. Other cases If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of plagiarism. 1. Plagiarism A. First offence of plagiarism I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the date he or she is advised to re-submit. III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark. B. Second offence of plagiarism If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module and shall be required to re-register the module B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 6 of 11 3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation
If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 5. Other cases If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. 6. Types/Variations of Cases: I. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. II. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students III. If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. IV. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted as per the policy. System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 7 of 11 b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that student alone. c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment. * for further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook. 2. Late Submission Regulations: It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days) for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of submission. Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. Late submission penalty for PG modules shall be imposed 10% deduction of the marks obtained for work submitted up to 1 week (5 working days) after the due date for submission and for work submitted after this, but up to 2 weeks (10 working days) late, student will lose a further 10% of the obtained mark (i.e. 20% overall). Work tendered for submission more than 2 weeks (10 working days) after the due date will not be accepted and an absence will be recorded for the assessment concerned. This will count as a failed attempt and may result in failing the module overall. Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 8 of 11 3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the following shall apply. Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions. Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial, animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the commencement of research. Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only for the intended purpose of research. Assessment Evaluation Criteria Classification And % Range Reflection and critical analysis. Knowledge and Understanding/ Application of Theory Evidence of Reading Referencing and Bibliography Presentation, Grammar and Spelling Outstanding Highly competent analytical skills and reflective practice, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values and principles and professional development planning. Extensive knowledge and depth of understanding of principles and concepts and /or outstanding application of theory in practice. Evidence of reading an extensive range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Excellent presentation, logically structured, using correct grammar and spelling, excellent crossreferencing and links to supporting evidence Excellent Strong analytical skills and reflective practice used, demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Excellent knowledge and understanding of principles and concepts and /or excellent knowledge and understanding of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a wide range of educationa
l literature/research and where applicable, workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Appropriate referencing and bibliography correctly using appropriate referencing style Good presentation, competently structured, using correct grammar and spelling, clear and easy to use links to supporting evidence Very Good Quality Good use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Good knowledge or key principles and concepts and/or good knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading a good range of educational literature/research and where applicable workplace strategies, policies and procedures. Generally well referenced with correct use of the appropriate referencing style Reasonable presentation, completely structured, acceptable grammar and spelling, acceptable links to supporting evidence System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 9 of 11 Good (Acceptable) Acceptable use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Acceptable knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or knowledge of the application of theory in practice Evidence of reading an appropriate range of educational literature/research and where applicable, relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Generally accurate use of appropriate referencing style Adequate presentation and structure, acceptable grammar and spelling, adequate links to supporting evidence Adequate/ Satisfactory Adequate use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required professional values, principles and competencies and professional development planning. Adequate knowledge of key principles and concepts and/or satisfactory evidence of the application of theory in practice. Evidence of minimal reading of educational literature/research and where applicable relevant workplace policies and procedures Adequate referencing. Appropriate referencing style used but may contain some inaccuracies. Weak presentation , satisfactory structure, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence Weak /Poor (all learning outcomes not adequately met) Little use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and/or professional development planning. Professional values and principles not reflected in the submission. and/or Insufficient/no use of analytical skills and reflective practice demonstrating personal learning and growth, insight into required competencies and professional development planning Little evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or little evidence of the application of theory in practice and/or No evidence of knowledge of key principles or concepts and/or no evidence of application of theory in practice Little or no evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant work place policies and procedures and/or No evidence of reading outside of the course textbook and/or reference to relevant workplace policies and procedures Little or no referencing, incorrect style, or very inaccurate use of appropriate referencing style Poor presentation, grammar and spelling, links to supporting evidence and/or Unacceptable presentation, grammar and spelling, structure is very poor, links to supporting evidence System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 10 of 11 Systems Analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) Spring 2020 Case Study Evaluation Grid Student ID: Session: Student Name: Group Task(40) Deliverables 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 Mark Task 1: Work Proposal No proposal or fewer details Proposal with missing parts Proposal with one part missing Complete with all details. 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 Mark Task 2.1 introduction Incomplete/ Weak/Plagiarized research on finding/ Brief background with non-detailed research on the chosen organization/system Satisfactory introduction Complete with all details. 0-1 3-5 6-8 9-10 Mark Task 2.2 Methodology 0-1 3-5 6-8 9-10 Mark Task 2.3 Problem definition Incomplete/ Weak/Plagiarized features Partially correct / average clarity/ few evidences Satisfactory description / satisfactory evidences Complete and accurate problem definition and relevant evidences 0-1 3-5 6-8 9-10 Mark Task 2.4 literature review Incomplete/ Weak/Plagiarized/ Partially correct / average analysis/30- 100 words Clear literature review with analysis of a relevant system. Number of words 100-150, Relevant literature review with minimum of 200 words/ proper citations and references Task 2.5 Alternatives and criteria 0-2 3-4 5 Mark Incomplete/ not relevant system in Average attempt Relevant alternative/ four evaluation System analysis and Design Concepts (COMP 1004) – Spring – 20 – CW (Assignment) – All – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_034_01 Page 11 of 11 alternative/ insufficient criteria criteria / correct evaluation 0-2 3-4 5 Mark Task 2.6 Features Incomplete/ Weak/Plagiarized Partially correct / insufficient number of relevant features/ partially relevant Complete and accurate/ at least four relevant features determined/ 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 Mark Task 2.7 Feasibility study Incomplete/ Weak/Plagiarized Partially correct – /average usefulness of supporting information. Satisfactory feasibility study–satisfactory supporting information. Complete and accurate feasibility study–correct supporting information. 0-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 Mark Mark Task 2.11 Reflection Incomplete/ Weak/Plagiarized Only one aspect is found(Critical thinking, Summary of learning experience, Knowledge gained) Only one aspect is missing Complete and convincing with all aspects verified Total marks Penalty Final marks Signature of the Instructor
Talk to us support@bestqualitywriters.com