Writing Homework Help

I need this done by 1pm MST on Saturday the 29th.

Comments from professor on the first assignment:

• Remember this is an essay with an introduction, body and conclusion. For your introduction, review what your paper topic and then your last sentence should be “This paper will….” And then tell your reader what they will read.
• Conclusion?Remember all essays have a conclusion to wrap up your paper.
• Journal names are always in italics, please review APA7
• Also make sure you use APA headings to separate out the questions that are asked for in the assignment.

Please review everything below including the grading rubric.

APA 7 is required for all sources used and cited – two peer reviewed articles and total of three references are minimum.

Textbook for the course:

Miller, R. L. (2017). Business law today: The essentials: Text and summarized cases (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.

ISBN: 9781305574793

Option #1: How Important Tort Liability is to Business

You are the manager of a highly successful local business. The small business society in your community asks you to write a paper for their monthly publication. In the featured article, you will be discussing, “How Important Tort Liability is to Business.” Remember that, for most torts, injured persons can bring actions against businesses as well as against individuals.

Using your professional or personal experience in the business world, discuss the following in your article:

• Discuss the extent of business negligence liability by identifying and clearly defining the relevant law(s), either defining a legal doctrine, provisions of law, or elements of a specific cause of action.
• Apply facts from your experience to the applicable law, doctrine, or cause of action studied.
• Clearly summarize lessons learned from the week as they apply to your fact pattern and make links to the readings and/or module.
• Then make a list of suggestions for minimizing business tort liability, in which you include new thoughts or ideas based on the module information. This is your reflection/insight, which logically would flow from each information point presented.
• Ensure your experience actually relates to the material for the week.

Sometimes students have difficulty identifying a personal or professional torts case. You may also research a torts case to discuss if you do not have a personal or professional experience to discuss. Be sure to complete all the bulleted points above.

In the area of torts, many causes of action are comprised of “elements.” Define each element and apply facts from your situation to the law or elements. For instance, if you write about a situation involving negligence, you would define negligence stating, “Negligence occurs where a person’s conduct falls below the standard of care, resulting in a breach of duty, which is the direct and proximate cause of injury to another person or thing. The elements of negligence are 1) duty; 2) breach; 3) causation; and 4) damages.”

Your well-written paper should be three to four pages in length, not including the title or references pages. Include a minimum of three credible sources beyond the textbook. The MGT315 Business Law Library Guide (Links to an external site.) can help you with finding quality resources.

Review the grading rubric and make sure to conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Be sure to reach out to your instructor early in the week if you have questions about the assignment.

Option #2: Product Liability

You work for a highly successful international manufacturer. Your boss is working with a group of clients who are located overseas and are not familiar with U.S. tort law. Your boss requests you to conduct some research on product liability. You recall from your business classes that businesses that make, sell, or lease goods can be held liable for the physical harm or property damage caused by those goods to consumers, users, or bystanders.

In your report, you are to include the following information:

• Identify and discuss the four (4) elements of negligence.
• Using the internet, research and analyze a legal case involving products liability.
• Discuss in detail the defenses that were raised or could have been raised.
• Provide your opinion on whether you believe it is fair to hold employers responsible for the negligent acts of their employees.

Your well-written paper should be three to four pages in length, not including the title or references pages. Include a minimum of three legal references as support for your paper. The MGT315 Business Law Library Guide (Links to an external site.) can help you with finding quality resources.

Review the grading rubric and make sure to conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.). Be sure to reach out to your instructor early in the week if you have questions about the assignment.

Rubric

MGT315 Mod 3 CT

MGT315 Mod 3 CT

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements	10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent	20 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials including correct identification and definition of relevant tort law(s), product liability, appropriate application of facts, and clear summary of applicable lessons. 16 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in correct identification and definition of relevant tort law(s), product liability, appropriate application of facts, and clear summary of applicable lessons. 12 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in correct identification and definition of relevant tort law(s), product liability, appropriate application of facts, and clear summary of applicable lessons. 8 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of relevant tort law(s), product liability, appropriate application of facts, and clear summary of applicable lessons.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis	20 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides strong or adequate thought, comparison, contrast, insight, and analysis of tort law and product liability. Thoughts include application of new thoughts or ideas based on module information. 16 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, comparison, contrast, insight, and analysis of tort law and product liability. Thoughts include application of new thoughts or ideas based on module information. 12 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in thought, comparison, contrast, insight, and analysis of tort law and product liability. Thoughts include application of new thoughts or ideas based on module information. 8 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate thought, comparison, contrast, insight, and analysis of tort law and product liability, or to include application of new thoughts or ideas based on module information.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples	10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Cites and integrates at least 3 credible sources. Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the importance of tort law and product liability to business enterprises. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Cites and integrates 1-2 credible sources. Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the importance of tort law and product liability to business enterprises. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Cites and integrates 1 credible source. Source or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the importance of tort law and product liability to business enterprises. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source citation is missing or is not credible.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.	10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Paper is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Paper is fairly well organized and written and is properly formatted as outlined in the assignment. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Paper is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Paper is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.	10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style	10 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error. 8 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors. 4 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.	10 pts
Total Points: 80