Economics homework help

David Hwu
ThursdayDec 3 at 9:09am
Manage Discussion Entry
The current advertising expenditure for GE is at $12M compared to Maytag at $0.7M. If Maytag stays out of the advertising market, then GE’s profit will be at $30M. If Maytag enters into the market, then the expected profit Maytag will be at $1M while GE’S Profit will be $20M. This results in a loss of $10M due to Maytag’s entry into the market. Whereas, if GE maintains its’ advertising expenditure to $700,000 and Maytag stays out of the market, then GE’s profit will be $35M. Now the risk is if Maytag enters into the advertisement market, then Maytag’s profit is expected to be $12M while GE’s profit will be $15M. This will result in a loss of $20M due to Maytag’s entry into the marketplace.
In a market such as home appliances, there is a limit of demand as appliance depreciation is slower than compared to clothing. GE will need to evaluate the current demand and seasonal timing when investing heavily in the advertisement. Knowing your competition, the marketplace, and how to effectively communicate are very important factors. In this situation increasing the advertisement funds should not be the best idea for GE at the moment due to the risk that Maytag may enter the marketplace. The unknown risk of them occurring is greater than the profit expected to be received. I recommend having GE wait until Maytag may also anticipate that GE will increase advertising may not be able to prevent Maytag from entering the market. Maytag may also anticipate that GE will increase advertising It would deter Maytag to enter the business even as the net profitability will be hit as the equilibrium has not been established.
A good current example of overspent advertisement would be Super Bowl ads. A 30-second ad spot in a Super Bowl can average around $3.5M. While some companies such as Hyundai and Toyota have improved their market share over that time, most have not (24/7 Wall St., 2012). Companies such as PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have competed over Super Bowl ads. Coco-Coal has spent more than almost every other advertiser. Since 2007, Coca-Cola has run several ads each year, including two 60-second commercials last year. Additional profits received from these ads did not cover the ads themselves.
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
24/7 Wall. (2012). Here Are The 8 Companies That Wasted The Most Money On Super Bowl Advertising. Retrieved December 03, 2020, from https://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-the-eight-companies-that-wasted-the-most-money-on-super-bowl-advertising-2012-2
 
 
 
 
Tayvia Shamburger
ThursdayDec 3 at 6:42pm
Manage Discussion Entry


GE
MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m
Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m
Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15

In the mutual-dependence recognized (MDR) oligopoly the game producing and selling a similar product, the strategy is (let’s say) advertising expenditures, and the payoff is market share and the profit associated with that market share (Douglas, 2012). The current advertising expenditure for GE is at $12M compared to Maytag at $0.7M. If Maytag stays out of the market as shown above in the chart, GE’s profit will be at $30M. If Maytag enters into the market, at $1M then GE’S profit will be $20M so that’s a $10M loss instantly by Maytag entering in the market at $1M. If GE keeps the $0.7M advertising and Maytag stays out of the market, GE’s profit is $35M. But on the contrary, if Maytag enters at $12M, Maytag profits would be $12M and GE’s $15M therefore once again affecting profits. GE will lose $20M in profits if Maytag entered the market at $0.7M advertising. By Maytag entering into the market, GE could potentially lose $10M-$20M depending on advertising budget upon entering.
If GE increased advertising to by $2M so from $12M to $14M, with Maytag profits at zero but automatically losing $1.5M when increasing advertising profits, their overall expected profits decrease by $1.5M dropping GE profit total from $30M to $28.5M. I don’t think that adding an additional $2M more on advertising is best for GE with Maytag earning the market with $0 profits as the market tends to change. When advertising at GE is increased by $2M, the company is negatively being affected so it’s best to leave advertising at $12M. With Maytag out of the market, GE is earning $30M. Regardless, increasing advertising for brand awareness is not necessary unless the market was flowed with several competitors entering the market at once. GE profits can change quickly. Furthermore, additional spending on advertising would not achieve the effect of deterring Maytag from entering as increasing advertising is decreasing GE profits.
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

 David Hwu

ThursdayDec 3 at 10:06am
Manage Discussion Entry
A company must systematically research customer’s preferences and its competitors to stay ahead of trends or to identify any threats. Risks involved with a differentiation strategy include competitors imitating what a company has already spent the money to establish and implement. Differentiation and focus strategies for creating sustainable competitive advantage have changed the rules for marketing in an organization. Regardless of what a company sells, if that company can keep its costs below its competition, it has secured a major advantage. A company can set itself apart by offering quality and unique products and superior customer service. A differentiation strategy design is to appeal to customer needs and preferences.
One example can be the retail industry that has used this strategy of a franchise-based model to expand and create a further reach into newer markets. The vertical restraints for this approach are the issue and concern regarding supply chain establishment. If this concern is not solved properly then there will be supply chain-related quality issues from the franchisee. It is more important in food-related franchisees where quality needs to be the same throughout otherwise the brand value is diluted. Think of a brand like McDonald’s, if the quality at any of the franchisee is compromised the whole brand gets diluted. This is the primary reason where vertical restraints are creating problems for franchise-based models. A company can set itself apart by offering quality and unique products and superior customer service Differentiation and focus strategies for creating sustainable competitive advantage have changed the rules for marketing in an organization.
 
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
 
 
Pamela Andrews
YesterdayDec 5 at 5:25pm
Manage Discussion Entry
In the low- cost strategy, a company must have a thorough understanding of costs and how to continually reduce them.  The company must be willing to standardize its offerings in order to manage costs, which implies that exceptions requested by prospective customers must be limited or excluded in order to keep costs down. A low-cost company would attempt to reduce their cost of product that would lead to enhancing their contribution margin. These specific companies accomplish this strategy by decreasing the costs per product item. A technique these companies use to accomplish this goal is to concentrate on enhancing higher production rates and sales volumes (Douglas, 2012).
The company, which makes a decision to use a differentiation technique, concentrates on gaining very high profits by manufacturing an item or service, which is exclusive, compared from those provided by their rivals. The differentiation technique is a program to make a product/service, which is of higher quality from the consumer’s point of view; this means the client is generally prepared to pay more for the particular item. These organizations usually expend more on their item quality to let their items to be exceptional from those of their competitors, which leads to getting higher a price point in the market (Douglas, 2012). In a differentiation strategy, the company must totally understand its customers’ needs and preferences.  It must be driven to innovate to continually address those wants and needs.  And, it must build its brand to maintain its position and visibility.
As per research, many companies use both strategies as a combination of low cost and differentiation strategies depending on the product. For example, years ago Sony was the leader in personal musical devices, with the highest volume and profitability and now there is Apple using those same strategies.
 
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
 

Economics homework help

David Hwu
ThursdayDec 3 at 9:09am
Manage Discussion Entry
The current advertising expenditure for GE is at $12M compared to Maytag at $0.7M. If Maytag stays out of the advertising market, then GE’s profit will be at $30M. If Maytag enters into the market, then the expected profit Maytag will be at $1M while GE’S Profit will be $20M. This results in a loss of $10M due to Maytag’s entry into the market. Whereas, if GE maintains its’ advertising expenditure to $700,000 and Maytag stays out of the market, then GE’s profit will be $35M. Now the risk is if Maytag enters into the advertisement market, then Maytag’s profit is expected to be $12M while GE’s profit will be $15M. This will result in a loss of $20M due to Maytag’s entry into the marketplace.
In a market such as home appliances, there is a limit of demand as appliance depreciation is slower than compared to clothing. GE will need to evaluate the current demand and seasonal timing when investing heavily in the advertisement. Knowing your competition, the marketplace, and how to effectively communicate are very important factors. In this situation increasing the advertisement funds should not be the best idea for GE at the moment due to the risk that Maytag may enter the marketplace. The unknown risk of them occurring is greater than the profit expected to be received. I recommend having GE wait until Maytag may also anticipate that GE will increase advertising may not be able to prevent Maytag from entering the market. Maytag may also anticipate that GE will increase advertising It would deter Maytag to enter the business even as the net profitability will be hit as the equilibrium has not been established.
A good current example of overspent advertisement would be Super Bowl ads. A 30-second ad spot in a Super Bowl can average around $3.5M. While some companies such as Hyundai and Toyota have improved their market share over that time, most have not (24/7 Wall St., 2012). Companies such as PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have competed over Super Bowl ads. Coco-Coal has spent more than almost every other advertiser. Since 2007, Coca-Cola has run several ads each year, including two 60-second commercials last year. Additional profits received from these ads did not cover the ads themselves.
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
24/7 Wall. (2012). Here Are The 8 Companies That Wasted The Most Money On Super Bowl Advertising. Retrieved December 03, 2020, from https://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-the-eight-companies-that-wasted-the-most-money-on-super-bowl-advertising-2012-2
 
 
 
 
Tayvia Shamburger
ThursdayDec 3 at 6:42pm
Manage Discussion Entry


GE
MAYTAG Advertising = $12m Advertising = $0.7m
Stay Out $0, $30m $0, $35m
Enter $1m , $20m $12m, $15

In the mutual-dependence recognized (MDR) oligopoly the game producing and selling a similar product, the strategy is (let’s say) advertising expenditures, and the payoff is market share and the profit associated with that market share (Douglas, 2012). The current advertising expenditure for GE is at $12M compared to Maytag at $0.7M. If Maytag stays out of the market as shown above in the chart, GE’s profit will be at $30M. If Maytag enters into the market, at $1M then GE’S profit will be $20M so that’s a $10M loss instantly by Maytag entering in the market at $1M. If GE keeps the $0.7M advertising and Maytag stays out of the market, GE’s profit is $35M. But on the contrary, if Maytag enters at $12M, Maytag profits would be $12M and GE’s $15M therefore once again affecting profits. GE will lose $20M in profits if Maytag entered the market at $0.7M advertising. By Maytag entering into the market, GE could potentially lose $10M-$20M depending on advertising budget upon entering.
If GE increased advertising to by $2M so from $12M to $14M, with Maytag profits at zero but automatically losing $1.5M when increasing advertising profits, their overall expected profits decrease by $1.5M dropping GE profit total from $30M to $28.5M. I don’t think that adding an additional $2M more on advertising is best for GE with Maytag earning the market with $0 profits as the market tends to change. When advertising at GE is increased by $2M, the company is negatively being affected so it’s best to leave advertising at $12M. With Maytag out of the market, GE is earning $30M. Regardless, increasing advertising for brand awareness is not necessary unless the market was flowed with several competitors entering the market at once. GE profits can change quickly. Furthermore, additional spending on advertising would not achieve the effect of deterring Maytag from entering as increasing advertising is decreasing GE profits.
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

 David Hwu

ThursdayDec 3 at 10:06am
Manage Discussion Entry
A company must systematically research customer’s preferences and its competitors to stay ahead of trends or to identify any threats. Risks involved with a differentiation strategy include competitors imitating what a company has already spent the money to establish and implement. Differentiation and focus strategies for creating sustainable competitive advantage have changed the rules for marketing in an organization. Regardless of what a company sells, if that company can keep its costs below its competition, it has secured a major advantage. A company can set itself apart by offering quality and unique products and superior customer service. A differentiation strategy design is to appeal to customer needs and preferences.
One example can be the retail industry that has used this strategy of a franchise-based model to expand and create a further reach into newer markets. The vertical restraints for this approach are the issue and concern regarding supply chain establishment. If this concern is not solved properly then there will be supply chain-related quality issues from the franchisee. It is more important in food-related franchisees where quality needs to be the same throughout otherwise the brand value is diluted. Think of a brand like McDonald’s, if the quality at any of the franchisee is compromised the whole brand gets diluted. This is the primary reason where vertical restraints are creating problems for franchise-based models. A company can set itself apart by offering quality and unique products and superior customer service Differentiation and focus strategies for creating sustainable competitive advantage have changed the rules for marketing in an organization.
 
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
 
 
Pamela Andrews
YesterdayDec 5 at 5:25pm
Manage Discussion Entry
In the low- cost strategy, a company must have a thorough understanding of costs and how to continually reduce them.  The company must be willing to standardize its offerings in order to manage costs, which implies that exceptions requested by prospective customers must be limited or excluded in order to keep costs down. A low-cost company would attempt to reduce their cost of product that would lead to enhancing their contribution margin. These specific companies accomplish this strategy by decreasing the costs per product item. A technique these companies use to accomplish this goal is to concentrate on enhancing higher production rates and sales volumes (Douglas, 2012).
The company, which makes a decision to use a differentiation technique, concentrates on gaining very high profits by manufacturing an item or service, which is exclusive, compared from those provided by their rivals. The differentiation technique is a program to make a product/service, which is of higher quality from the consumer’s point of view; this means the client is generally prepared to pay more for the particular item. These organizations usually expend more on their item quality to let their items to be exceptional from those of their competitors, which leads to getting higher a price point in the market (Douglas, 2012). In a differentiation strategy, the company must totally understand its customers’ needs and preferences.  It must be driven to innovate to continually address those wants and needs.  And, it must build its brand to maintain its position and visibility.
As per research, many companies use both strategies as a combination of low cost and differentiation strategies depending on the product. For example, years ago Sony was the leader in personal musical devices, with the highest volume and profitability and now there is Apple using those same strategies.
 
Reference:
Douglas, E. J. (2012).  Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA. Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
 

Operations Management homework help

Open Response  Choose any 4 of these open response questions to answer.
For each open response answer, include at least 4 concepts from the textbook and at least 1 reference to other required articles or videos.
1. Despite increases in diversity training programs, outcomes are not consistently leading to increases of diversity within upper management. What might be the reason for this phenomenon and how might it be addressed?
2. Communication is central to effective management. Effective communication helps deliver difficult, yet actionable feedback and tailor a message during crisis situations. First, describe the concept of noise. Second, outline at least four factors that senders should consider before communicating important messages to receivers.
3. Some people argue that leadership and management are entirely different roles within an organization that cannot be carried out by the same individual. Do you agree with this statement? Provide supporting evidence and logic to back up your position. Regardless of your position, are both roles necessary for an organization to be successful? Choose one approach to leadership (e.g., transformational, charismatic, or path-goal) and use this theory to demonstrate the importance of leadership.
4. Describe impression management (IM) techniques and the impact they have on interview success. Include descriptions and examples of the self-focused IM techniques and how they might affect interview success. Finally, discuss who is more likely to engage in IM.
5. Mario owns a boutique furniture store for which Clinton is a long time supplier of pillows and decorative items. Because of repeated years of negotiations over prices, delivery dates, and products, Mario and Clinton have formed a mutually beneficial relationship. Please discuss some other outcomes of repeated negotiations.
6. What is the difference between the mechanistic model and the organic model of organizational structure? Give an example of a company organized as mechanistic, and explain why a mechanistic structure is a good fit for this company. Give an example of a company organized as organic, and explain why an organic structure is a good fit for this company.
 
1. When applying terms/concepts from the textbook, apply bold and underlined formatting to those terms. Do not bold and underline entire sentences – just the key term/concept. Terms/concepts from the textbook do not need a citation.
2. When applying concepts from the assigned resources, please use in-text citations.
3. No reference list needed.

Economics homework help

The Assignment:
In figure 5-4(c) of our text, the celebrated Phillips curve is depicted.  Discuss its meaning as it relates to wages and unemployment.  Be sure to take advantage of the Tips & Hints and supplemental resources provided.
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings.
What Success Looks Like:
Be careful with this one!  This question is deceptively tricky! The question does not ask you to just describe the graph and its axes!  If you merely repeat the definition from the text, you will get minimal credit!  There is much more here and this ties into this week’s Problem Set.  The question does ask you to describe the relation of the variables and the way in which a relationship may be misleading because of the limitations of its sample period… and because the underlying hypothesis was incomplete.  (As a hint, keep in mind that this chapter is about multivariate regression.)
Please be sure to:
1)  Answer the question asked,
2)  Answer all the parts of the question asked,
3)  Proofread your essay for spelling and grammar.
Please note that you will receive the minimum credit (“Below Expectations”) if you merely repeat the definition of the Phillips curve!  We are economists, not parrots!
Discussion 2 addresses a very important concept from economics… which is also often rather misunderstood.  I’ll provide more elaboration on the Philips curve as we progress, but in the meantime:
1) Discuss the meaning of the Philips curve “…as it relates to wages and unemployment.”  What does the Philips curve explain?  And why was it believed to explain it?  It is not enough to simply say that it shows some sort of relationship between wages and unemployment!  You must look deeper!  You need to provide more detail than that.
As a clue, this Week is all about figuring out whether or not you have enough variables or not.  As another clue, the Philips curve as postulated in the 1960s is an example of correlation not being causation!  The trade-off postulated by Philips does not exist!  Why?  Well, back to my clue, maybe there is another variable that should be considered.  This discussion rewards research, on the internet or elsewhere.
The Phillips Curve demonstrates that bad economics can be politically popular… and economically disastrous.  Although American politicians especially took comfort in the Phillips Curve as they attempted to manage employment and inflation in the ’60’s, they were entirely flummoxed when the economy entered “stagflation” in the ’70’s.  In stagflation, unemployment and inflation were both high.  The “misery index” (unemployment rate added to inflation rate) was created to gauge the pain of this situation.  
The inability of the Carter Administration to master this apparent paradox provided Ronald Reagan with some of his most compelling rhetoric and set the stage for President Reagan’s election in 1980.  When I was an undergrad, economists believed that stagflation could only be conquered through a protracted depression or perhaps not at all… probably proving that they were smarter than they were useful.  Interestingly, the limited period examined by the text (as analyzed by the British economist responsible for this eponymous curve) perhaps inadvertently shows how one can reach a flawed conclusion from history if one does not look at enough of the history… and that correlation indeed does not imply causation!
You can watch a splendid animation of the Phillips Curve (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as it evolved from 1961 to 1987.  You can also download the slides (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)  (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.from the corresponding undergraduate macroeconomics lecture at Carnegie Mellon University (just follow the re-direct and you will find yourself at a webpage that will provide you with a variety of interesting options).
– – – – –
Thompson, P. (2011). Inflation and Unemployment. 88-301 Intermediate Economics, CarnegieMellonUniversity. Retrieved on May 8. 2011 from http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/88-301/phillips/phillips_curve.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/88-301/phillips/phillips.html&h=300&w=400&sz=50&tbnid=Y2Q9CFtDWRxdMM:&tbnh=93&tbnw=124&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dphillips%2Bcurve%26tbm%3Disch%26tbo%3Du&zoom=1&q=phillips+curve&hl=en&usg=__PStVhW9uxt6jS95Szv49oIcz4OE=&sa=X&ei=fSXHTaDzCaXv0gHtj_GxCA&sqi=2&ved=0CEEQ9QEwAg
  • attachment

    figure5-4c.PNG

Economics homework help

The Assignment:
In figure 5-4(c) of our text, the celebrated Phillips curve is depicted.  Discuss its meaning as it relates to wages and unemployment.  Be sure to take advantage of the Tips & Hints and supplemental resources provided.
Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings.
What Success Looks Like:
Be careful with this one!  This question is deceptively tricky! The question does not ask you to just describe the graph and its axes!  If you merely repeat the definition from the text, you will get minimal credit!  There is much more here and this ties into this week’s Problem Set.  The question does ask you to describe the relation of the variables and the way in which a relationship may be misleading because of the limitations of its sample period… and because the underlying hypothesis was incomplete.  (As a hint, keep in mind that this chapter is about multivariate regression.)
Please be sure to:
1)  Answer the question asked,
2)  Answer all the parts of the question asked,
3)  Proofread your essay for spelling and grammar.
Please note that you will receive the minimum credit (“Below Expectations”) if you merely repeat the definition of the Phillips curve!  We are economists, not parrots!
Discussion 2 addresses a very important concept from economics… which is also often rather misunderstood.  I’ll provide more elaboration on the Philips curve as we progress, but in the meantime:
1) Discuss the meaning of the Philips curve “…as it relates to wages and unemployment.”  What does the Philips curve explain?  And why was it believed to explain it?  It is not enough to simply say that it shows some sort of relationship between wages and unemployment!  You must look deeper!  You need to provide more detail than that.
As a clue, this Week is all about figuring out whether or not you have enough variables or not.  As another clue, the Philips curve as postulated in the 1960s is an example of correlation not being causation!  The trade-off postulated by Philips does not exist!  Why?  Well, back to my clue, maybe there is another variable that should be considered.  This discussion rewards research, on the internet or elsewhere.
The Phillips Curve demonstrates that bad economics can be politically popular… and economically disastrous.  Although American politicians especially took comfort in the Phillips Curve as they attempted to manage employment and inflation in the ’60’s, they were entirely flummoxed when the economy entered “stagflation” in the ’70’s.  In stagflation, unemployment and inflation were both high.  The “misery index” (unemployment rate added to inflation rate) was created to gauge the pain of this situation.  
The inability of the Carter Administration to master this apparent paradox provided Ronald Reagan with some of his most compelling rhetoric and set the stage for President Reagan’s election in 1980.  When I was an undergrad, economists believed that stagflation could only be conquered through a protracted depression or perhaps not at all… probably proving that they were smarter than they were useful.  Interestingly, the limited period examined by the text (as analyzed by the British economist responsible for this eponymous curve) perhaps inadvertently shows how one can reach a flawed conclusion from history if one does not look at enough of the history… and that correlation indeed does not imply causation!
You can watch a splendid animation of the Phillips Curve (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as it evolved from 1961 to 1987.  You can also download the slides (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)  (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.from the corresponding undergraduate macroeconomics lecture at Carnegie Mellon University (just follow the re-direct and you will find yourself at a webpage that will provide you with a variety of interesting options).
– – – – –
Thompson, P. (2011). Inflation and Unemployment. 88-301 Intermediate Economics, CarnegieMellonUniversity. Retrieved on May 8. 2011 from http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/88-301/phillips/phillips_curve.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/88-301/phillips/phillips.html&h=300&w=400&sz=50&tbnid=Y2Q9CFtDWRxdMM:&tbnh=93&tbnw=124&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dphillips%2Bcurve%26tbm%3Disch%26tbo%3Du&zoom=1&q=phillips+curve&hl=en&usg=__PStVhW9uxt6jS95Szv49oIcz4OE=&sa=X&ei=fSXHTaDzCaXv0gHtj_GxCA&sqi=2&ved=0CEEQ9QEwAg
  • attachment

    figure5-4c.PNG

Economics homework help

Complete Problem 5.29 of Chapter 5 and submit to your instructor. Complete your assignment in Excel and submit your completed Excel workbook to your Instructor for grading.
5.29. Refer to Example 5.6 in the chapter. It was shown that the percentage change in the index of hourly earnings and the unemployment rate from 1958-1969 followed the traditional Phillips curve model. An updated version of the data, from 1965-2007, can be found in Table 5-19 on the textbook’s Web site.

  1. Create a scattergram using the percentage change in hourly earnings as the Y variable and the unemployment rate as the X variable. Does the graph appear linear?
  2. Now create a scattergram as above, but use 1/X as the independent variable. Does this seem better than the graph in part (a)?
  3. Fit Eq. (5.29) to the new data. Does this model seem to fit well? Also create a regular linear (LIV) model as in Eq. (5.30). Which model is better? Why?
  • attachment

    Capture.PNG
  • attachment

    ProblemSet4Tips.PNG

Economics homework help

Complete Problem 5.29 of Chapter 5 and submit to your instructor. Complete your assignment in Excel and submit your completed Excel workbook to your Instructor for grading.
5.29. Refer to Example 5.6 in the chapter. It was shown that the percentage change in the index of hourly earnings and the unemployment rate from 1958-1969 followed the traditional Phillips curve model. An updated version of the data, from 1965-2007, can be found in Table 5-19 on the textbook’s Web site.

  1. Create a scattergram using the percentage change in hourly earnings as the Y variable and the unemployment rate as the X variable. Does the graph appear linear?
  2. Now create a scattergram as above, but use 1/X as the independent variable. Does this seem better than the graph in part (a)?
  3. Fit Eq. (5.29) to the new data. Does this model seem to fit well? Also create a regular linear (LIV) model as in Eq. (5.30). Which model is better? Why?
  • attachment

    Capture.PNG
  • attachment

    ProblemSet4Tips.PNG

Marketing homework help

I need someone to write an 8-10 page essay in which they develop an international marketing plan for a US company to start operating in a Non US market such as China, South Korea, Mexico, India, Russia, etc…
Requirements of final copy:
-Social environment of the country
-Cultural Analysis
-Economic Analysis including foreign investment in the country
-Choose one US company and develop its international marketing for that specific country market
Paper:
– 8-10 pages double spaced including Works Cited/References page
  • attachment

    requirements.pdf

Marketing homework help

I need someone to write an 8-10 page essay in which they develop an international marketing plan for a US company to start operating in a Non US market such as China, South Korea, Mexico, India, Russia, etc…
Requirements of final copy:
-Social environment of the country
-Cultural Analysis
-Economic Analysis including foreign investment in the country
-Choose one US company and develop its international marketing for that specific country market
Paper:
– 8-10 pages double spaced including Works Cited/References page
  • attachment

    requirements.pdf